User talk:GobsPint

GobsPint, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi GobsPint! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of accredited naturopathic medicine programs

Hello GobsPint,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of accredited naturopathic medicine programs for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 21:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of accredited naturopathic medicine programs

Hello, GobsPint,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Britishfinance and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, List of accredited naturopathic medicine programs, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 22:28, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hackback

Hello, GobsPint. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hackback".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 12:26, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of accredited naturopathic medicine programs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of accredited naturopathic medicine programs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of accredited naturopathic medicine programs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 12:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

New message from DannyS712

Hello, GobsPint. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Trilogy Education Services.
Message added 23:28, 31 May 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DannyS712 (talk) 23:28, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Data factory

The article Data factory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this is an encyclopedic term. WP:NOTDICTIONARY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of YSI 2300 STAT PLUS Glucose and Lactate Analyzer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YSI 2300 STAT PLUS Glucose and Lactate Analyzer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YSI 2300 STAT PLUS Glucose and Lactate Analyzer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mike1901 (talk) 20:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Toilet talk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toilet talk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toilet talk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QueenofBithynia (talk) 19:10, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

"Pig butchering" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Pig butchering and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Pig butchering until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 02:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2024

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:43, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pathologists' assistant, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New York and CLIA. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Should Medical laboratory credentials and certifications in the United States be merged?

Hello. I noticed that the article you recently created, Medical laboratory credentials and certifications in the United States, seems to be very similar in content to the existing article List_of_professional_designations_in_the_United_States#Medicine_and_Health_Care. I wonder if the two articles should be merged, or is there a reason for them to both exist; do they somehow cover different material? Gronk Oz (talk) 07:29, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

No,I would oppose a merge. It it comparable to Nursing credentials and certifications, which has its own article. There is also a standalone List of chiropractic credentials. A number of the laboratory designations are shared amongst the various certification boards. The list is incomplete, as it needs the list from American Society for Clinical Pathology#Certifications merged in as well. I've noticed a lack of articles on clinical laboratory topics here.GobsPint (talk) 15:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Medical laboratory credentials and certifications in the United States moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Medical laboratory credentials and certifications in the United States. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of American Medical Technologists

The article American Medical Technologists has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

After a good faith search, I do not think that suitable sources exist for this topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BeauregardTA (talk) 10:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, GobsPint. Thank you for your work on American Certification Agency for Healthcare Professionals. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This page is so short that it's best discussed in the context of the wider body.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 08:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

@Klbrain: - Thanks for the feedback. There are some starter pages about organizations that certify tens of thousands of people that are inherently notable, but there is just limited material. Sometimes short pages are appropriate.

I'm concerned the merger into Institute for Credentialing Excellence (ICE) makes that article unbalanced as it certifies dozens of organizations. GobsPint (talk) 03:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

I see your point. However, there's plenty of space on Institute for Credentialing Excellence to merge the others in, or to create new content. Two sentences of prose and a short table (which may be better formatted as a short list) doesn't seem to wait heavily on the page to my eyes. Klbrain (talk) 06:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, GobsPint. Thank you for your work on Generative biology. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

There's so little text here that this material is better placed with the context of the broader, more widely accepted field of Developmental biology.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 12:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Public health laboratory

added links pointing to KY, CA, IN, IL and CO

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)