User talk:Glorytohypnotoad

Hi there! I am also participating in the Wiki Ed summer seminar. I don't have much experience with Wikipedia yet.Alexpkin (talk) 14:36, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alexpkin! I'm also participating and don't have much experience either. But looking forward to learning to be an expert Wikipedia-er with you! user:glorytohypnotoad

Hello, I'm Marentette and also in the Summer seminar. Up until now, I've mostly been shepherding students through Wiki assignments. I thought it high time I did some editing and planning myself. One thing I'll suggest - you might want to respond on a Alexpkin's talk page rather than on your own. This makes it more likely he will notice your response! Marentette (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work!

		The WikiCookie
		You've learned how to use basic wikicode in your sandbox. You can always return there to experiment more.

Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Glorytohypnotoad (talk) 21:26, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. These kinds of suggestions help smooth the process of learning Wikipedia! Marentette (talk) 21:45, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message! Alexpkin (talk) 14:34, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Potential pages to add to or edit

Self-expansion model (updating this to include more recent research including fMRI studies and studies utilizing the model outside of the relationship context; and potentially adding to the IOS Scale section)
Romance_(love) (updating the Major Theories section (6) to include a brief review of recent neuroimaging studies, perhaps adding a subsection right after Relationship Behaviors (6.7) about love and the brain (as 6.8)
Caryl Rusbult (while there are a few references listed, citations need to be created, and some additional links should be added. Also, more information needed on her work "she made seminal contributions to theoretical social psychology including the investment model of commitment processes, a theoretical model of accommodation processes, and the Michelangelo effect" but these are not really described further. Michelangelo effect might need to be updated to Michelangelo Phenomenon which already has a Wikipedia page and thus could be linked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marysia Placzek has been accepted

Marysia Placzek, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Glorytohypnotoad, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Della V. Mosley (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please follow the tutorial at WP:INTREFVE. Every statement must be referenced with in-line citations. This is a hard requirement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Della V. Mosley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 20:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Glorytohypnotoad! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 20:17, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Della V. Mosley

Hello, Glorytohypnotoad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Della V. Mosley, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]