User talk:Glevum
WikiGuide Welcome
| Hello Glevum. Welcome to the English version of Wikipedia | |||
| Thank you for your participation in this project. We hope that you will stay to contribute and that you will find the collaboration process enjoyable. | |||
| Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that started in 2001 and is free for all to use and edit under certain guidelines and principles that all users should understand and adhere to. These principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information. | |||
 |
The five pillars of Wikipedia. The fundamental principles of the project. |
 |
Help. How to get help. |
 |
Tutorial. This tutorial is a basic guide to editing. |
 |
Your user pages and your sandbox. How to experiment and edit in your user space. |
 |
Mentoring program. Request help in your first steps of editing. |
 |
How to start a page. Help on creating your first article. |
 |
Things to avoid. How to avoid common errors and mistakes. |
 |
Style Guide. How to write in an acceptable style. |
 |
Main policies of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines. |
 |
Frequently asked questions. Some common questions and their answers. |
 |
Help Desk. Here you can ask other editors for assistance |
 |
Quick reference. A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki. |
 This is your Talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss things with them. At the end of your messages you must put your signature by signing with four ~~~~ (just as I have done) or by pressing the button in the editor bar as shown here in the picture. By the way, you don't need to sign edits that you make in the articles themselves as those messages will be deleted. Another valuable page that may provide information and assistance is User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia. My name is Buster7. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist or give you guidance and contact information. Good Luck editing! | |||
````Buster Seven Talk 13:24, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Half Barnstar |
| Thanks for the info. Val sarah25 (talk) 20:13, 18 August 2012 (UTC) |
II Corps (German Empire)
Glevum, please do not collapse the 1914 mobilisation OrBat in II Corps (German Empire). The table contains an anchor "MCT" that all the other German Empire Corps point to. See III Corps (German Empire). It has a line in its 1914 mobilisation OrBat of
- Munition Trains and Columns corresponding to II Corps
If the table in II Corps is collapsed, the link in III Corps will not work properly. It is why I have deliberately left the II Corps table uncollapsed. Hamish59 (talk) 08:57, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
- Not a problem, Glevum! Fully understand the consistency angle. Hamish59 (talk) 12:50, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Your edits to "Hannibal's Crossing of the Alps"
Your edits are appreciated. I started that article awhile ago, and it needed those revisions.SteveMooreSmith3 (talk) 05:37, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Invitation to join Milhist
Cornwall
I've reinstated the statements about the national dish status of the pasty, which you commented out. That is the term that the sources use, and we should reflect that. The issue of Cornwall's status as a nation has been discussed countless times on countless different pages here, and the consensus is that a nation is not the same as a sovereign state, or even a constituent country - regardless of current administrative arrangements. Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:33, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Unsuccessfull minor rewording
Hi, Glevum!
I see that you work quite a bit with small improvements, which make the texts less illogical, and therefore a little bit easier to read. IMHO, also this work is great and important, and one of the main advantages with the whole wiki concept is that it enables such "wikignoming".
However, I think that your change here made the text more illogical, not less. There now is no clear connection between the first part of the sentence and the rest of it. Before your edit, I think the sentence was technically correctly formed, but indeed probably too technical. My original sentence was complex enough to make the relations between the various parts hard to follow, I suppose.
Do you think
- The males and females are so distinct in their morphology, that it often makes it very hard to decide whether or not a given male and female belong to the same species, unless they are captured while mating
would be better? I'm a little suspicious as regards "so...that" constructs. However, in this case, perhaps such a construct might do the text easier to follow. JoergenB (talk) 10:51, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment @Glevum, Following a quick glance of your rewording & spelling works myself. I would hate to be rude but, they're a hit or miss. Whenever you edit an article more than a few words, half of it seems to be an improvement, the other half just worse. DA1 (talk) 02:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- In vs On and Was vs Were and Its vs Their are some of the things you need to work on. And you overuse the word "that", sometimes editors leave that out in boxes and plot summaries because they're trying to be succinct.
- "Here's the pencil you gave me"... I presume you would prefer it be "Here's the pencil that you gave me" even though the former example was completely fine. That's what I mean. DA1 (talk) 02:36, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Glevum. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Glevum. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Comment mistake
Typoed the closing tag here. ('->' instead of '-->') FYI. Now fixed. --Palosirkka (talk) 13:14, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Glevum. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |