User talk:Ginger Maine Coon

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ginger Maine Coon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! bobrayner (talk) 20:32, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MEDRS

We need to use secondary sources thanks.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:10, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sure no worries, review article and secondary source define what we are looking for with respect to refs.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:09, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. When you recently edited Cornelia B. Wilbur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sybil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sunrise/Roswell

Hi, As you will see the Sunrise marketing campaign has again surfaced on the Roswell page. I have deleted it once more, but I feel that we may have to apply for protection on this page for what seems a advertising ploy. What are your views? Best regards, David. David J Johnson (talk) 20:02, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I have have now requested protection for this page. Best regards, David. David J Johnson (talk) 11:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, please see my latest on the Roswell Talk page. It looks as though we are in for a "edit war", unless we can stop this marketing ploy quickly. Best regards, David. David J Johnson (talk) 23:52, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my latest on Dennis Brown's Talk Page. It appears that the SUNRISE folk intend to spam once more as soon as the block is lifted on 31 August, I assume this also means that they will start again with offensive comments of individual Talk Pages? Further action may be required. Regards, David. David J Johnson (talk) 21:00, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks David. It is getting interesting. They can't stop writing on other people's Talk page except the article Talk page. Where is the manner? Something to hide? Let see what's next.Ginger Maine Coon (talk) 01:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

Hi! I just wanted to welcome you to WikiProject Women Scientists. Thanks for joining! :) Keilana|Parlez ici 18:31, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi Ginger Maine Coon! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 19:49, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nanomedicine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Methodist Hospital (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-a-thon Invitation

CHF small logo
 Please join the Chemical Heritage Foundation Edit-a-Thon, June 20, 2013.
Build content relating to women in science, chemistry and the history of science.
Use the hashtag #GlamCHF and write your favorite scientist or chemist into Wikipedian history!

Hi! We'd love to have you involved. The article on Mildred Cohn needs someone with knowledge of chemistry to expand discussion of her work, and I believe Paula T. Hammond is involved in nanotechnology, which you are interested in. I hope you can take a look. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 15:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mary, I sure will look into these articles and see whether I can contribute.Ginger Maine Coon (talk) 14:15, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Induced pluripotent stem cell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transplantation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Meyer

I left a notification on FTN about it. If no new eyes appear within a day or so, I was intending on asking some editors who know the sourcing policy well to review the changes, namely IRWolfie, AndyTheGrump, and Dave Souza (who already reverted the same IP on another article). I don't see any need for administrative assistance at the moment, but the adminstrator to ask would be Mann Jess, who is familiar with the topic area. What do you think? Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 17:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


ThatCampPhilly Edit-a-thon Invitation

CHF small logo
 Please join the Wikipedia Edit-a-thon at THATCamp Philly, September 27, 2013, held at the Chemical Heritage Foundation. Bring your own content to work on, or get an early start on Ada Lovelace Day with our resources about women in science, chemistry and the history of science. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 15:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marie de' Medici cycle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Divine Justice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

I notice that you are marking all your edits as "minor", please read WP:MINOR - you should only be doing this for minor fixes like spacing, spelling, etc. If you add new content or reword existing content please leave the "minor edit" box unchecked. Tobus (talk) 02:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! Women in Red World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

You are invited! Join us remotely!

World Virtual Edit-a-thon on Women in Science

  • Dates: 8 to 29 November 2015
  • Location: Worldwide/virtual/online event
  • Host/Facilitator: Women in Red (WiR) in collaboration with Women scientists: Did you know that only 15% of the biographies on Wikipedia are about women? WiR focuses on "content gender gap". If you'd like to help contribute articles on women and women's works, we warmly welcome you!
  • Sponsor: New York Academy of Sciences
  • Event details: This is a virtual edit-a-thon hosted by WiR in parallel with a "phyisical" event during the afternoon of Sunday, November 22 in New York City. It will allow all those keen to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in science to participate. As the virtual edit-a-thon stretches over three weeks, new participants will be able to draw on the assistance of more experienced editors while creating, translating or improving articles on women who are (or have been) prominent in the field. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome.
  • RSVP and learn more: →here←--Ipigott (talk) 10:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April Fools? Nope! Welcome to the Women Scientists worldwide online edit-a-thon during Year of Science

Join us!

Women Scientists - worldwide online edit-a-thon -
a Year of Science initiative

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ginger Maine Coon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ginger Maine Coon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Ginger_Maine_Coon"