User talk:Georgewilliamherbert/Archive2008-04

Teller/Ulam jpeg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:TellerUlamAblation.png http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teller-Ulam

Could you crush the cylinder a little more for the graphics on the right side? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.154.215.249 (talk) 23:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

article note

Klingon Empire (Star Fleet Universe) is up for deletion. just want to let you know. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 21:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FN/IWI images

Hi, I read that you'd be somehow able to retrieve these images and use them here under a fair use policy? That'd be fantastic if possible, I'm kind of discouraged with Commons, after having made so many requests to manufacturers and having to wait weeks for a single reply, only to have them all removed with one fell swoop. The AK-74 images were also removed, if we could get those back that'd be great. BTW, I have the FN/IWI photographs on my HD, if you want to upload them, shoot me your email and I'll send them over. Koalorka (talk) 06:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the return of the revenge of the bloc of Wikizilla

I hate bother you again but two new accounts without prior contributions have dropped by to cast their vote at fourth generation page. As you well know WZ was very active in his vote stacking efforts in that straw poll, most likely this is just some new attempt to force his way through.Freepsbane (talk) 03:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

seastead

Hi,

Here you undid my insertion of www.seastead.org, adding this explanation on my talk page:

Please don't insert it into the main Micronation article until you have a reasonable level of reliable sourcing and can justify it as being one of the 3-5 most notable projects in the general micronational classification of new-country projects, which is our criteria for inclusion in the main article.

The very notable Peter Thiel just pledged $500,000 to get the new Seasteading Institute up and running, i guess that would make it more notable than the ones already listed. Joepnl (talk) 15:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've been bold. Joepnl (talk) 23:49, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fantasy Articles?

Hello Georgewilliamherbert:

I saw your name on the Wikiproject Ships.

Please take a look at USS Mizpah (PY-29). I chanced on this and I think it is fantasy, but I'd like a second opinion.

Also the other US ship edits by User:Rbbloom. I think this person is a specialist in nonsense.

Thanks, Wanderer57 (talk) 15:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User: Quorty

Please intervene with regard to the user Quorty. What bugs me is the tone he takes in every dispute. Without much investigation, he slams every tool at his disposal at articles and users who work on them. Every user page request is mean-spirited, no one is ever given benefit of the doubt. I post now from my IP so I won't get beat up by him on my registered page -- in an hour or so there will be a marker put on the IP page showing where it's from and implying some kind of misdoing or accusing it outright.

Quorty is a very powerful user, and there's really nothing regular joes like me can do about his nonsense. Is there anything a higher end user like you can do? Or somebody, just to get him to dial it back a notch or two? It's not the Spanish Inquisition -- it's a bunch of people working for free on a community encyclopedia project. I know I'm super-discouraged from creating new and notable content just for dread of having to spend my time wrangling with him instead of actually working on Wikipedia. 72.241.98.90 (talk) 20:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]