User talk:Geniac/Archive 17

Archive 10

←

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Question about spaces on edit screen

Just curious: why do you prefer the spaces before the pipes to separate parameters in a template, rather than after the pipes? Is there a technical reason? -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:15, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

I'm not so much preferring before or after the pipe, but that's how every example in Cite web and Cite news, and probably other templates, is formatted, thus setting the standard. So many refs don't have any spaces in the formatting at all. When they are formatted all jammed together with no spaces. Looking at a page in WPCleaner, it's so much easier to view the code when references aren't just one long line. --Geniac (talk) 04:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

OK, thanks. -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Please don't post the cartoon of Prophetﷺ..

Mr. Invidual, I request you to not undo my edits as you have done previously. It is not correct to keep the images depicting and mocking Prophetﷺ. Not only is it against his concent and generally prohibited but it is also in an insulting manner.

With hope, A concerned individual 111.92.117.232 (talk) 07:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

No. Wikipedia is not censored. --Geniac (talk) 12:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Please don't post the cartoon of Prophetﷺ - Part 2

Please leave like that, citizen. We all know, with full understanding, that 'insulting respected individuals' is wrong. Completely wrong. Please, be mannered. Please remove those cartoons fast. Please understand the situation.

You also have loved ones. Imagine when they are being insulted in cartoons like those. You know how it feels. That's how the pious believers feel when they learn about these. Please have some mercy. Please remove.

With hope, A concerned citizen 111.92.117.232 (talk) 13:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

No. Wikipedia is not censored. --Geniac (talk) 04:06, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Chiloka.com

Thank you for doing mass removal of the source (no sarcasm intended). But while doing so, please leave behind {{cn}} every time. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:15, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Sure, that's reasonable. --Geniac (talk) 20:32, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Global Block Request

Please block this IP range https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:2402:3A80:1C46:D09C:3926:B13B:5ADE:6A75 117.226.227.26 (talk) 11:19, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

@117.226.227.26: Why? --Geniac (talk) 16:51, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

@Geniac: cause that's IP unknowingly edit Articles. Please block this range

I'm sorry, I don't know what that means, and I won't block anybody without good cause. --Geniac (talk) 00:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

@Geniac: See this unknowingly removing cast from Article.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:2402:3A80:1C46:7BFB:9503:1856:4375:C868

@Geniac: Hey, See this also IP unknowingly removing cast from this Article.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1069844585

No. Take it to WP:ANI. Keep bothering me, and you will no longer be welcome on my talk page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 17:09, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

You are most welcome sir.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:45, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

can i have it Boredwiki (talk) 14:04, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Added birthday

I have added birthday of Kamalinee Mukherjee which is removed. I know her personally so I added it. Please check this. Ovi054 (talk) 03:25, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

how can Movie Fit be an unreliable source on Intent to Kill, and what makes it not appropriate?

What makes the Movie Fit an inappropriate referencing on the article? Was there bad information? Can somebody please clarify? Angela Kate Maureen Pears 13:46, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

On their Privacy Policy page, moviefit.me states they get their information from themoviedb.org, which is user-generated content, and Wikipedia, which is a circular reference. Also, their site has no information on who runs the site, their staff editorial structure or their fact-checking procedures. I emailed them on February 28 to ask those things and I haven't received a reply yet. --Geniac (talk) 18:38, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

@Tropical Storm Angela: Update: After not receiving a reply to my email after a week, I messaged them on Facebook to ask the same question. They blocked me. That doesn't fill me with a sense of confidence regarding their legitimacy. --Geniac (talk) 15:27, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gmills00

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Gmills00 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 18:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Need help on user page

Hey, Can you help me with my user page ? Actually I want to create a user page for me and I don't know how to create one and what all information should be added to it. Jyothis 101 (talk) 11:43, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

To create your user page, just go to it (User:Jyothis 101) and start typing then Publish Page. User pages typically contain a little information on yourself, then information on your work on Wikipedia. Such as the types of pages you like to edit, any WikiProjects you're a member of, links to any draft articles you're working on. That kind of thing. --Geniac (talk) 18:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Jyothis 101 (talk) 02:58, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Verifiability: "published"

Umm, hi Geniac, I have removed your addition of material based on an unpublished source from Raai Laxmi, as a central point of the verifiability policy is prohibiting such additions. With a raised eyebrow, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Er... [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] Erm. Eh. Umm. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

ToBeFree, It appears that you are correct; from reading archived noticeboard discussions, consensus is that OTRS tickets are not "published" by our definition. Therefore, lacking any differing community discussion and consensus on the topic, I will cease attributing information to them. --Geniac (talk) 03:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Caught up in ipb

Hello, I am harmless contributor but I got caught up in ipb here. Can you help me to get IPBE or something which will allow me to create account at acc. As I came to know about block when I was stucked at account creation. thanks QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 05:27, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

It looks like @JJMC89: has taken care of it by changing that block to anon only. Did that solve the problem? --Geniac (talk) 04:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

"Massacre (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Massacre (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Massacre (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Isha Koppikar

Hello my friend. I hope you are fine. I reverted an edit you made because I disagree that the source is unreliable. Upon what evidence did you make the determination? I don't mind being wrong on this. I'll be glad to revert myself if you can explain. Thanks ever so much and best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 09:09, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

My edit removed three sources. Which one do you feel is reliable? Geniac (talk) 00:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC). @GorgeCustersSabre: --Geniac (talk) 14:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

chakpak: Their About Us page said, "We aggregate content from disparate sources", with no indication of what those sources are. There are no owners, staff or editors listed anywhere that I can find.

koimoi: This site has been discussed or at least mentioned many times on Wikipedia as being unreliable. Example: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 August 31#Template:Koimoi

masala: Agreed to be unreliable at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 313#Masala!

Geniac (talk) 05:12, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Blocking these IPs

Hey Geniac, I noticed you blocked these IPs (2401:4900:1735:1FD7:1:1:F42F:C851, 2401:4900:369A:6E10:7050:1E0C:ECBD:25A7, and 2401:4900:1CE1:AEB9:C165:EA91:76A7:AD96) today.

While the reasons for the blocks were justified, they had not been notified on their talk pages prior to getting blocked. Wikipedia:Blocking policy mandates that they be notified at least once, which had not been done (as much as I can tell) for any of these. Also, the first two IPs only made one edit each, so they might have been unaware of policy.

Just a friendly notice, Augusthorsesdroppings10 (talk) 23:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

@Augusthorsesdroppings10: I didn't notify those 3 IPs because I didn't block those 3 specific IPs. I blocked the entire 2401:4900 range. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Partial block isn't nearly enough. Notifying every IP that falls within a blocked range would be burdensome, to say the least. Geniac (talk) 01:23, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Unblock my ip address

It's my humble request to you to unblock my ip address so that I can create a page regarding the famous temple... please i request you i never do same mistake again Jagdamba renuka (talk) 08:23, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

@Jagdamba renuka: The block was anon only. You have an account. You are not blocked. Geniac (talk) 04:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

I request you to please unblock my ip address. I really don’t remember doing anything wrong, if i have done it then i’ m really very sorry Its a humble request. Rushil567 (talk) 13:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

@Rushil567: Why? The block was anon only. You have an account. Geniac (talk) 03:15, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

please unblock my IP address.

All i have done is add a piece of knowledge backed by appropriate reference in the legacy section of the following page

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4_Months,_3_Weeks_and_2_Days Christoph zacharias (talk) 04:53, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

@Christoph zacharias: Why? You have an account, which is not blocked. Geniac (talk) 03:09, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Christoph zacharias (talk) 15:42, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Blocking problem

just tell me why I am blocked I have not done any abusive editing please unblock me Bhavesh Shiva (talk) 01:17, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

@Bhavesh Shiva: The fact that you could post this message to my talk page tells me immediately that you are not blocked. Why do you think you are blocked? Geniac (talk) 01:59, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

very very thanks bro Bhavesh Shiva (talk) 12:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

About my IP Banning

Hey there, I'm shocked to the news of my IP ban revealation just now as i have practiced my right to contribution of content as everyone has to, to make this community a better place. now i have been banned under "Disruptive editing" and according to your definition, i haven't performed any damaging activity. If you think so that i have done something wrong, kindly share detailed information. and I would like to get a warning to fix something that i haven't performed intentionally before imposing of a six month ban as a punishment, that is so unfair. kindly respond. I would love to hear back from you.! Thank you. Ramank.ln (talk) 10:12, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

@Ramank.ln: To appeal a block, place {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} on your talk page. Geniac (talk) 22:40, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

About my IP Banning

I see that you have blocked my editing Wikipedia via my IP address. You have cited Disruptive Editing as the reason. May I see where I have been disruptive, if you don't mind? Evidently, there would be more than one case of such editing, since a single incident--which could well be rectified-- would not give you the authority to dump me. I also notice that Ramank.ln has the same complaint. My wife and I have fought a winning Cancer battle for 20 months. Incidentally, I have been with Wikipedia for nigh on 14 years. After leaving the Indian Air Force, I became a professional editor down Magazine Lane and retired at 70. Moitraanak (talk) 13:59, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

@Moitraanak: To appeal a block, place {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} on your talk page. Geniac (talk) 05:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Or you could just stop blocking so much in the first place. 23.84.128.179 (talk) 15:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.