User talk:Frosty1000

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Your submission at Articles for creation: Crawfish Interactive (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. j⚛e deckertalk 17:20, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Frosty1000, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! j⚛e deckertalk 17:20, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


November 2014

Hello, I'm Lor. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Draft:Crawfish Interactive  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. LorChat 00:08, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why? This is a draft which was declined last week. I only had a limited time this morning to edit it so that I can re-submit it to be approved (changing references). Now all that work is gone and I may not be able to get back on this until next weekend. Is this normal? Frosty1000 (talk) 00:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crawfish Interactive (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:
This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Primefac (talk) 15:31, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crawfish Interactive (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eclipsed was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 07:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Crawfish Interactive concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Crawfish Interactive, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Frosty1000"