User talk:Felix-felix

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive

Archives Archive 2

Thanks for visiting my Talk: page.

If you are going to post something to me here, please:

*Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
*Use headlines when starting new talk topics.
*Do not make personal attacks.

Comments which fail to follow the above rules above may be immediately archived or deleted, as I see fit, really

Thanks again, and enjoy. Or not..

Contents

New Talk page

Ah! That's better! I feel some poetry coming on: I met a traveller from an antique land Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone Stand in the desert. Near them, on the sand, Half sunk, a shatter'd visage lies, whose frown And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command Tell that its sculptor well those passions read Which yet survive, stamp'd on these lifeless things, The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed. And on the pedestal these words appear: "My name is Ozymandias, king of kings: Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!" Nothing beside remains. Round the decay Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare, The lone and level sands stretch far away. Heh.FelixFelix talk 18:46, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Live page, not archive

Hi. You recently made the page "Archive 2:Felix-felix" - which is a live, article page. I have moved it to User:Felix-felix/Archive 2. To link to that page, you would use [[User:Felix-felix/Archive 2]] - you do not need to put the full URL for Wiki pages. See WP:LINKING for more on this; For more help, you can either;

  • Leave a message on my own talk page; OR
  • Use a {{helpme}} - please create a new section at the end of your own talk page, put {{helpme}}, and ask your question - remember to 'sign' your name by putting ~~~~ at the end; OR
  • Talk to us live, with this or this.

Best wishes,  Chzz  ►  13:56, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:03U302OCTOBR10.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:03U302OCTOBR10.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://forbiddenplanet.co.uk/blog/2008/octobriana-more-incredibly-strange-comics/. As a copyright violation, File:03U302OCTOBR10.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:03U302OCTOBR10.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO talk 16:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to File:03U302OCTOBR10.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Johann Hari notes.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Johann Hari notes.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:39, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

London Wikimedia Fundraiser

Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:52, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London

All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 17:53, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

David R

I am gathering evidence for a SPI I want to bring at User:Eyepeepeeeye/IPs but someone wants to delet it. what do I do? Eyepeepeeeye (talk) 16:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, Zafio is claiming that he's presented strong circumstancial evidence in the past that he's not David R. I am attempting to maintain WP:AGF and WP:NPOV. Yonmei (talk) 00:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note-I can't say that I'm terribly impressed by the 'circumstantial evidence' that user:zafio isn't david r, I certainly regarded him as one of dave r's sock/meatpuppets back when he started posting in 2007. The preference for hagiographic, tediously long explanations of bits of Hari's writing, and wholesale reverts would be typical of dave r. His contribution history [1] would support the notion that he is too, and I note that his recent editing has started to attract attention in the blogosphere, for what that's worth.FelixFelix talk 10:37, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, fwiw, while user:zafio was earlier claiming to be based in South-East Scotland, the IP address from which he edited my Talk page just now (2.24.249.104 (talk) 16:49, 16 July 2011 (UTC)) is located near Skipton, North Yorkshire. I had already pointed out to user:zafio as a friendly warning, presuming that he was not David R ( WP:AGF), that to a neutral eye, his editing history and his Wikipedia history generally did not look good in the middle of sockpuppeting rumours. He did not extend WP:AGF: he opted to get angry and declare he had every right to edit Johann Hari's page if he wanted, any time he wanted. I didn't think that was a sensible attitude if he wasn't connected to David R, and I still don't. Yonmei (talk) 18:10, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion is sailing close to the wind: see WP:OUTING. Please note that is a link to a subsection of Wikipedia:Harassment, a page with the nutshell summary: "Do not stop other editors from enjoying Wikipedia by making threats, repeated annoying and unwanted contacts, repeat personal attacks, intimidation, or posting personal information." I think both of you should bear that in mind. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Felix-Felix - you might not remember me, but I got embroiled in the Hari editing for a few months at the end of 2007 (occasionally signed in as Sam Spade, but mostly unsigned), but was ultimately thwarted by the indefatiguable David R. Feels great to be vindicated, doesn't it? I wrote to Private Eye about the incident in the Autumn of 2007 and they never responded - they really missed a scoop! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.85.37 (talk) 15:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright Sam-I remember you well (I didn't have too many friends editing that page back in 2007!), it is really quite nice to be vindicated-although I feel a bit like I'm talking to myself by replying to you here-how come you don't sign in more often?FelixFelix talk 10:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to follow the discussion that hopefully will unfold here re User:Zafio almost-instinct 16:48, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Felix! I forgot my Wikipedia password/login details and, in any case, only ever contributed to the JH entry! I'll be keeping an eye on it in the future, in case 'meth productions' gets back in business! SamuelSpade79 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.5.42.215 (talk) 21:57, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
For services against sockpuppetry, we salute you. Ned-kogar (talk) 11:50, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For the long hours of work you put in defending the Johann Hari page against the "improvements" demanded for it by David R from Meth Productions and his sockpuppets, in the face of criticisms from other Wikipedians who would not believe what was going on, I salute you! Yonmei (talk) 14:39, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sockpuppet editing

There is an open WP:SPI case looking at sockpuppet editing primarily on the Johann Hari/ Talk page. As you edited the Johann Hari/Talk page between 2004 and 2011, your input is welcomed.

File:Alpha Intercalated Cell Cartoon.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alpha Intercalated Cell Cartoon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:28, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Alpha Intercalated Cell Cartoon.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:39, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1595 club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Malta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reach@wikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

DiptanshuTalk 13:55, 11 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Just been reading an age old debate where you stood your ground, felt a star was in order Mramoeba (talk) 11:07, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Felix-felix. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Felix-felix. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Paleolithic diet; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn (talk) 16:34, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, but I've not done any reverts, just a bunch of individual edits, starting (and finishing) yesterday. So not an edit war, unless the definition of an edit war has changed since I've been away...FelixFelix talk 10:33, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Felix-felix"