User talk:Fatherwannabe

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ina Garten

It would be worth noting only IF a substantial percentage of her audience left her because of concerns about her political opinions but there is no substantiation. We need numbers of people that dropped her show exclusively because of that for verification from a Reliable source, please. --Javaweb (talk) 05:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)JAvaweb[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Ina Garten, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 23:09, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That would be just peachy if EVERYONE did it - but you seem to be targeting ME. I can tell you dozens of Wiki articles which have NO citation. SO, either do this to everyone, or leave me alone, jerk.

Wikipedia should have FEWER unsupported statements, not one more. Neither Geniac nor I know each other or you so I can assure you it is this edit we have an issue with and there is nothing personal going on. --Javaweb (talk) 06:42, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Javaweb[reply]


No - you have a problem with the truth - that people have MORALS and won't follow someone who supports KILLING CHILDREN and using contraception. Because it doesn't fit in your little schema for how the world should work, you delete it. Believe me, I will continue to place this on her page, and I will not stop.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you are reminded not to attack other editors, as you did on your talk page. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 02:10, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]