User talk:FaithChecker

Yusuf Mohamed and others

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Thank you. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 19:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 21:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

I have provided references that backup my edits. There is nothing controversial about it. You are being controversial by reverting my edits which I have provided solid proof for. FaithChecker (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Your references are unsatisfactory per the living persons policy, which you should read before making any further edits. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 23:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

One word mate- Doctrinaire comes to the fore with you. I have given as reliable a source as can be gathered- Liverpool Official website and Four Four Two website respectively and you still insist on reverting my edits. I have come on Wikipedia as I am interested in ones beliefs. I have studies many famous peoples faiths and I know when I am editing that I'm absolutely sure one belongs to a particular faith. So what is your agenda other than being a Doctrinaire ?. FaithChecker (talk) 12:21, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please see the discussions on the talk page before adding any further categories, your edits are a breach of the biographies of living people policy. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 13:08, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Ok I understand it appears you have an agenda. Richard Dawkins fan club any good ? I've provided very reliable sources, You can't get any more reliable than an interview. Forget One Night in Hackney,One Night spent deliberating with you is too much. FaithChecker (talk) 14:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

No, you haven't produced very reliable sources for the categories you want to add. Have you actually read the policy I've repeatedly linked to and asked you to read, or even where I've pasted it onto article talk pages? I'll even copy it here:

Category tags regarding religious beliefs and sexual orientation should not be used unless two criteria are met:

• The subject publicly self-identifies with the belief or orientation in question;
• The subject's beliefs or sexual orientation are relevant to the subject's notable activities or public life, according to reliable published sources.

Unless there is consensus both of those are satisfied, the category doesn't get added. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 15:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Ethnic and religious categories

Hi. Just a friendly note to endorse what ONiH has said to you above; categories need referencing just like anything else here. If you can't provide reliable sources to support the significance of the subject's ethnicity or religion to their notability, then the category does not belong on the article, per our policy on verifiability. This becomes even more paramount when dealing with living people. Please do not edit war to restore unreferenced ethnic categories on articles on living people. Thanks a lot, and leave a message here or at my talk if you have any questions. --John (talk) 02:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I have blocked this account indefinitely per the evidence here. I suggest you use your other account to edit, always remember to log in to edit, and stay well away from adding ethnic categories for which there is no evidence. --John (talk) 16:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

No content in Category:Ghanaian Muslims

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Ghanaian Muslims, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Ghanaian Muslims has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Ghanaian Muslims, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)