User talk:Enterprisey/Archive 10

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script modification

I've edited your reply-link.js script here to not reload the page. Instead it retrieves the new section content via ajax. Could you please test this version. It works intermittently for me and I am not sure why. --Gryllida (talk) 01:13, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please check this issue and also that one in afch. If you do not have time to implement any of this then guidance about how to do it would be most appreciated, as I have a beginner knowledge of JavaScript. Gryllida (talk) 00:40, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Both have now been  Done. Enterprisey (talk!) 22:49, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://tools.wmflabs.org/afdstats/

For at least 2 days, the above tool hangs without results. — Maile (talk) 13:27, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me, took 645.19 seconds, though. Sam Sailor 13:52, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The wmflabs.org servers have been experiencing problems the last days, so that might have caused it. Regards SoWhy 14:13, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Server glitches makes sense. I wonder if it's browser specific. I just changed computers to check this, and it doesn't work for me on either computer. Both computers use Firefox 67.0 (64-bit) Although, until yesterday, I never had an issue pulling this up. — Maile (talk) 14:18, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not browser-specific. I just tried it on Chrome Version 74.0.3729.169 (Official Build) (64-bit). Still doesn't pull up for me. — Maile (talk) 15:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Just put MusikAnimal's code up and it seems to be behaving (if really slowly) now. Enterprisey (talk!) 17:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hooray! It works! — Maile (talk) 17:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And now it doesn't. — Maile (talk) 00:53, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And now it does. Just takes forever. — Maile (talk) 01:51, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 6

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (May 2019).

Hello everyone and welcome to the 6th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Enjoy your summer, --DannyS712 (talk) 23:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).

Administrator changes

removed Andonic • Consumed Crustacean • Enigmaman • Euryalus • EWS23 • HereToHelp • Nv8200pa • Peripitus • StringTheory11 • Vejvančický

CheckUser changes

removed Ivanvector

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
  • An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
  • An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.

Technical news

  • The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
  • Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:48, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AFCRHS.js

Project page was moved to Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories, could you update the script? Thanks, Sam Sailor 06:32, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Enterprisey (talk!) 22:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(cc Sam Sailor) Enterprisey (talk!) 22:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

cv-revdel

...should fail gracefully, given an error, or do something when encountering the spam blacklist. I tried to add a rd1 tag to a page, and one of the sources tripped the blacklist. Rather than closing, giving an error, or doing anything, the script just remained in the same state, except that it didn't add the actual tag. See [1]. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 01:22, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Had such a case today with Italian Islands of the Aegean. Manually trying to add {{copyvio-revdel}} with the first URL from this case brought up MediaWiki:Spamprotectiontext. Sam Sailor 06:15, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sam Sailor and DannyS712, this should be fixed now; sorry for the long delay. Enterprisey (talk!) 08:43, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Enterprisey bot down since June 7

See [2]. Could you check what's going on? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 03:36, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Although it was unfortunately out for a while, seems to be in working order now. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tweak to bag bot sorting

[3] This would allow better sorting of bot ops in the table, rather than have 'none' in the middle of the sort. See [4] for how that would affect the table. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 16:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It would also be nice to have usernames linked. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:06, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also, there is an issue with headers with links with a leading : in them. The current TOC has
instead of
because of [[:Category:Personal userbox galleries]] used to generate the link. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:18, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Again an issue at Wikipedia:Bot requests#Bot to clear :Category:Journal articles needing infoboxes vs Wikipedia:Bot requests#Bot to clear Category:Journal articles needing infoboxes. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:57, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Headbomb, all issues fixed (took long enough ); let me know if everything looks good. Enterprisey (talk!) 08:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 7

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (June 2019).

Hello everyone and welcome to the 7th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Miscellaneous


Having published 6 issues of this newsletter, I decided it was time to move it out from my user space. It is now located at Wikipedia:Scripts++. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 11:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).

Administrator changes

removed 28bytes • Ad Orientem • Ansh666 • Beeblebrox • Boing! said Zebedee • BU Rob13 • Dennis Brown • Deor • DoRD • Floquenbeam1 • Flyguy649 • Fram2 • Gadfium • GB fan • Jonathunder • Kusma • Lectonar • Moink • MSGJ • Nick • Od Mishehu • Rama • Spartaz • Syrthiss • TheDJ • WJBscribe
1Floquenbeam's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
2Fram's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.

Guideline and policy news

  • In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.

Technical news

  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply-link

Reply link does load on Minerva skin. But unfortunately preview and reply feature don't work. Could you please optimize this script for mobile? Masum Reza📞 09:06, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Resolved, sort of, by reply-link being superseded by DiscussionTools.) Enterprisey (talk!) 09:03, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kyoto Animation arson attack

I re-instated the info about why the names of the deceased have yet to be released. In my opinion it doesn't need a time stamp as the information is still true that the victims haven't been identified yet. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:29, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Knowledgekid87: - to sneak in an answer, time stamps are wanted for edits, as at some stage it won't be correct. That's fine if the editor always immediately appeared and updated, but that's not always the case. As such, it's helpful to add it in so that, in the event it's not updated, readers can know "ok that was the case 4 weeks ago, but might not be now" Nosebagbear (talk) 12:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Script

Yo; any chance you could still write this script when you have a moment? It would be much appreciated. Erik Humphrey (talk) 19:02, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! Will do. Enterprisey (talk!) 06:20, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Erik Humphrey, see User:Enterprisey/edit-section-on-hover.js. Enterprisey (talk!) 06:33, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your efforts! Erik Humphrey (talk) 12:56, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 8

Hope everyone is having a good winter (or summer, for those in the northern hemisphere). Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 02:40, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
  • The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist.

    Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfBAG

Hello Enterprisey, following your successful nomination, you have been added to the Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group. You may want to watchlist Wikipedia:BAG/Status to see changes to the backlog. Welcome to the BAG. — xaosflux Talk 11:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! SQLQuery me! 18:58, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good idea — Congrats! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 10:32, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bots Newsletter, August 2019

Bots Newsletter, August 2019

Greetings!

Here is the 7th issue of the Bots Newsletter, a lot happened since last year's newsletter! You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list.

Highlights for this newsletter include:

ARBCOM
  • Nothing of note happened. Just like we like it.
BAG

BAG members are expected to be active on Wikipedia to have their finger on the pulse of the community. After two years without any bot-related activity (such as posting on bot-related pages, posting on a bot's talk page, or operating a bot), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice. Retired members can re-apply for BAG membership as normal if they wish to rejoin the BAG.

We thank former members for their service and wish Madman a happy retirement. We note that Madman and BU Rob13 were not inactive and could resume their BAG positions if they so wished, should their retirements happens to be temporary.

BOTDICT

Two new entries feature in the bots dictionary

BOTPOL
  • Activity requirements: BAG members now have an activity requirement. The requirements are very light, one only needs to be involved in a bot-related area at some point within the last two years. For purpose of meeting these requirements, discussing a bot-related matter anywhere on Wikipedia counts, as does operating a bot (RFC).
  • Copyvio flag: Bot accounts may be additionally marked by a bureaucrat upon BAG request as being in the "copyviobot" user group on Wikipedia. This flag allows using the API to add metadata to edits for use in the New pages feed (discussion). There is currently 1 bot using this functionality.
  • Mass creation: The restriction on mass-creation (semi-automated or automated) was extended from articles, to all content-pages. There are subtleties, but content here broadly means whatever a reader could land on when browsing the mainspace in normal circumstances (e.g. Mainspace, Books, most Categories, Portals, ...). There is also a warning that WP:MEATBOT still applies in other areas (e.g. Redirects, Wikipedia namespace, Help, maintenance categories, ...) not explicitely covered by WP:MASSCREATION.
BOTREQs and BRFAs

As of writing, we have...

  • 20 active BOTREQs, please help if you can!
  • 14 open BRFAs and 1 BRFA in need of BAG attention (see live status).
  • In 2018, 96 bot task were approved. An AWB search shows approximately 29 were withdrawn/expired, and 6 were denied.
  • Since the start of 2019, 97 bot task were approved. Logs show 15 were withdrawn/expired, and 15 were denied.
  • 10 inactive bots have been deflagged (see discussion). 5 other bots have been deflagged per operator requests or similar (see discussion).
New things
Other discussions

These are some of the discussions that happened / are still happening since the last Bots Newsletter. Many are stale, but some are still active.

See also the latest discussions at the bot noticeboard.

Thank you! edited by: Headbomb 17:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Invitation to project revival

Dear user, I, with Willbb234, are a attempting to revive the Wikiproject Requested Articles, of which you are a member. If you wish to be a part of our effort, feel free to add your signature in it's talk page. Best regards, Eni vak (speak) 16:21, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your email

Hello, Enterprisey. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Wikipedia email from user "ZI Jony".
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

XfD Stats malfunctiong

I'm afraid to report that the tool is malfunctioning. The "user" and "number of discussions" text boxes work fine, but pulling up the results leads to a "ERR_SPDY_PROTOCOL_ERROR" error message on Google Chrome. Might be a domain issue in the code. ToThAc (talk) 00:52, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).

Administrator changes

added Bradv • Chetsford • Izno
readded Floquenbeam • Lectonar
removed DESiegel • Jake Wartenberg • Rjanag • Topbanana

CheckUser changes

removed Callanecc • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Oversight changes

removed Callanecc • Fox • HJ Mitchell • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Technical news

  • Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
  • The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:Enterprisey/reply-link#Reply_link_and_the_Teahouse

Please see my message there. Interstellarity (talk) 17:31, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories.

Technical news

  • As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:55, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 9

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (August and September, 2019).

AfD stats

giving a 500 - Internal Server error :-( ∯WBGconverse 15:59, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Winged Blades of Godric, is this still happening? I just tried it and didn't get one. Enterprisey (talk!) 19:12, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nah; it's all fixed by now! Sorry for bothering you. ∯WBGconverse 11:28, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposals regarding AfC & NPP

You are invited to comment at discussion currently taking place at Relationship of Articles for Creation and New Page Reviewer for pre-opinion on the combined functions of Articles for Creation (AfC) and New Page Review (NPR).

This mass message invitation is being sent to subscribed members of the work group at the project The future of NPP and AfC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RfA tools

Hello there Enterprisey, I just recently became aware of some of your tool work on wiki. It looks like you've worked on/replaced/repaired some of the ScottyWong tools. Is there perhaps a fix or replacement for this one? I did see the "voting pattern" one for RfA, but was interested in seeing how a single user voted over multiple RfAs. TY for all your great work - it's appreciated. — Ched (talk) 23:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I remember there certainly used to be one (as in a version more recent than scottywong's). I thought it was in xtools, but I checked there and didn't see it. I put a few minutes into looking elsewhere but couldn't find anything. I would certainly be happy to make it myself if one can't be found, although I'm a bit busy IRL lately (...when is that ever not the case, haha) so we might have to delay a bit. That said, I'm going to try to get as much stuff out the door as possible before the upcoming WikiConference, so there's a good chance we'll have a tool like this by then. Enterprisey (talk!) 01:17, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Enterprisey/delsort.js

User:Enterprisey/delsort.js may need to be updated to use "csrfToken" as well. It didn't work for me for the past few days. feminist (talk) 02:21, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up! Guess I gotta go through all my user scripts now. Enterprisey (talk!) 01:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Now fixed. Sorry about the small delay. Enterprisey (talk!) 01:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Phab

T233443 and sub-tasks might be of interest to you :-) ∯WBGconverse 12:46, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, been following them! Very excited to see what comes of that. Enterprisey (talk!) 01:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Enterprisey/delsort

Hi Enterprisey, Good'y. I have been using the above script to do the delsort at AfD; however, for the last week, it seems after I have selected the subje from the "Delsort list", I could not make a save. Kindly advise and thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:25, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed; thank you for letting me know! Enterprisey (talk!) 01:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vandalism information

EnterpriseyBot does not appear to be updating User:EnterpriseyBot/defcon anymore. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:37, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I pushed a bad code change. Should be fine now. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:10, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 10

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (October 2019).

Hello everyone and welcome to the 10th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

fancy-diffs

Great script! Love it. I noticed a strange error here Special:Diff/924005770 (BTW, thank you for diff-permalink as well). The links on the right side diff for Paul H. O'Neill and Mary E. Peters don't seem to work correctly for me. When I click the latter, for example, I am led to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_%3Cins_class%3D%22diffchange_diffchange-inline%22%3EE.%3C/ins%3E_Peters.--- Coffeeandcrumbs 06:49, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fixed now. Thanks for the bug report! Enterprisey (talk!) 21:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed it is. Thank you! --- Coffeeandcrumbs 06:25, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
One more error visible in Special:Diff/925309717. Do Ctrl-F for diffchange-inline"> to find it. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 07:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again! Fixed. Enterprisey (talk!) 09:16, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Script installer

Script installer seems to be adding JS: before the name of the user script when installing ([5][6][7][8][9]). – BrandonXLF (t@lk) 07:09, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reporting! I assumed the entire contents of the source parameter in the infobox was the script name. Now it'll just grab the first script link it sees. Enterprisey (talk!) 07:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ACE2019

Hello Enterprisey, you appear to have submitted your candidacy after the nominations were closed. Would you like to proceed (to letting the commissioners decide?) — xaosflux Talk 00:09, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Xaosflux, yes, I would like to proceed. Enterprisey (talk!) 00:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, follow up discussion opened at Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination#Possible_disqualification_-_Enterprisey. — xaosflux Talk 00:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The commissioner team has deemed you qualified, but left a caveat if other challenges want to be raised. I doubt that will happen, best regards and good luck with the election. — xaosflux Talk 02:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good to hear, and thanks for letting me know! Enterprisey (talk!) 02:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Original Barnstar
Way to keep me guessing if you were gonna do it or not. What a showman. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:06, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Seriously, when I said lots of people wait till the last minute, I didn't think this many of them would. I have no clue how this is going to shake out, but best of luck! Beeblebrox (talk) 07:06, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FFU script

Could you please fork the FFU part from the AFC script like you did with AFCR? It sucks that I can't review those FFU requests quickly because my username is not listed at the AFC participants list. Masum Reza📞 16:22, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Masumrezarock100, as far as I'm aware, there has been no script that is compatible with the current version of FFU for many years. If you can't review requests fast enough because you can't use a script, you need to slow down. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:38, 14 November 2019 (UTC)(talk page watcher)[reply]

Greetings from ~Boston

It was great to meet you last weekend. I'm very impressed with your work, and I'm glad you decided to run for ArbCom. See you at the next event! —Emufarmers(T/C) (Benjamin) 01:09, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

da Vinci Barnstar for your Navigation popups enhancement

The da Vinci Barnstar
Thanks for this enhancement to ! Your enhancement will be leveraged many times over by improved gnome productivity! – wbm1058 (talk) 14:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply link

Reply link doesn't work on my talk page. Can you fix that please? Interstellarity (talk) 17:12, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

offset-history-link.js contradicting Twinkle

Just FYI, enabling User:Enterprisey/offset-history-link.js makes the AGF Rollback link from Twinkle fail to work. I liked the effect of the offset-history-link script, but Twinkle is mandatory to my work so I can't use it. Best regards and thanks again for all the work you put into these scripts. --Muhandes (talk) 12:50, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Muhandes, should be fixed now thanks to a great patch from User:Þjarkur. Enterprisey (talk!) 19:32, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed indeed, thanks, and thanks User:Þjarkur. --Muhandes (talk) 17:59, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have caused MusikAnimal some grief...

... and I have you to thank for it.

In delsort, right now the script selects an insertion point in the skin directly (it might reasonably instead be some sort of modal but I don't know how to do that myself :), a point in the skin which not all skins have (cough Timeless cough). Would you mind if you fixed that? I think the preferable way would be to target #contentSub instead of #jump-to-nav, but you could also guard against timeless using an if-else on the skin to insert it in Timeless in the else statement (since we Timeless are few and far between).

Entirely untested, but my button hasn't worked for a year now and I'd like it to. :( --Izno (talk) 22:58, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Works now, I think. (Sorry for the wait...) Enterprisey (talk!) 00:50, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny bug report

Hello, thank you for your great BOTREQ status page! I just wanted to let you know that it currently says a task has -1 replies since the original post wasn't signed. Just thought you might like to know! ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

editToken

Hello Enterprisey,

Your scripts User:Enterprisey/sync-template-sandbox.js, User:Enterprisey/orcp-helper.js, User:Enterprisey/draft-sorter.js, User:Enterprisey/easy-brfa.js, User:Enterprisey/falsePositiveHelper.js, User:Enterprisey/req-helper.js, User:Enterprisey/Gadget-DRN-wizard.js and User:Enterprisey/AFCFFU.js are no longer functional because they attempt to get an editToken from mw.user.tokens. The scripts should instead get a csrfToken. editTokens were removed from mw.user.tokens on October 3, 2019 at Phabricator during this edit as they were redundant to csrfTokens.– BrandonXLF (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The scripts User:EnterpriseyBot/reply-dialog.js and User:EnterpriseyBot/delsort-dev.js have the same issue.– BrandonXLF (talk) 00:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Fixed all of them. Enterprisey (talk!) 10:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 11

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (November 2019).

Hello everyone and welcome to the 11th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Enjoy your thanksgiving --DannyS712 (talk) 08:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#AfD stats down?

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#AfD stats down?. —usernamekiran(talk) 17:25, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).

Administrator changes

added EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
removed Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂

CheckUser changes

readded Beeblebrox
removed Deskana

Interface administrator changes

readded Evad37

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Thank you for your note. I'm sure you know these procedures better than I do, and I trust your judgement. I added that report based on this note in WP:RAA:

  • An administrator can repair damage made by a malicious user more quickly than other users: if someone is making multiple damaging edits it will be easier for you to report them than try to repair everything yourself.

The vandalism is stale, but seems to have escaped cleanup. Chabala (talk) 07:23, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Peace Dove

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension. Happy Holidays to you and yours. ―Buster7 ☎ 14:49, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Lucky

Well, lucky you, you are not going to be an arb next year, but that's a pretty strong showing for a first-time run. Just throwing in takes nerve and I for one am glad you ran. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:33, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, especially on the lucky part Regards SoWhy 10:01, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A new script

Hi, just wanted to let you know that I created a script (User:Majavah/Unslashifier.js) that was listed on your dashboard. Majavah (t/c) 11:05, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Majavah, looks good, and thanks for making it! Enterprisey (talk!) 07:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for User:Enterprisey/diff-permalink

  • Can you auto include the Specialdiff inside double square brackets so that it is ready to post, so the script should give, [[SpecialDiff FOO|diff]] instead of SpecialDiff FOO
  • Can you take a look at User:GoldenRing#Generate_Diffs and update its fork in your user page. It is very helpful and it stopped working for some reasons. I posted on GR's talk but looks like he is not editing nowadays. --DBigXrayᗙ 17:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:52, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Looking good, Enterprise!!! Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Just came across your great user page. Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Cheers!!! --Sm8900 (talk) 16:02, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Easy BRFA doesn't transclude BRFAs

Just thought I should tell you. Thanks for the great script by the way! ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 21:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fixed by the update I made last month. Thanks for letting me know! Enterprisey (talk!) 00:19, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
  • The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input. No proposed process received consensus.

Technical news

  • Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
  • When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [10]

Arbitration

  • Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 12

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past two months (December 2019 and January 2020).

Hello everyone and welcome to the 12th issue issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 06:12, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Finding wikitext positions for Parsoid HTML

You said you were wondering if this is possible, so here's how:

  1. Fetch the Parsoid HTML, e.g. from https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/page/html/The_Fighting_Temeraire/914474798. Note the revision ID and the "etag" HTTP header value.
  2. Fetch the Parsoid data for your HTML output, e.g. from https://en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/page/data-parsoid/The_Fighting_Temeraire/914474798/c26208b0-f29e-11e9-b2c6-a5178ebb33fb (using the revision ID and the etag – you need to pass the etag to request the data for a particular parse result, since changes in transcluded templates affect the output).
  3. Fetch the wikitext source, e.g. from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fighting_Temeraire?oldid=914474798&action=raw (or the API)

Then, to find the wikitext position corresponding to a piece of the HTML output, for example this link in the second paragraph:

<a rel="mw:WikiLink" href="./HMS_Temeraire_(1798)" title="HMS Temeraire (1798)" id="mwEg">HMS <i id="mwEw">Temeraire</i></a>

…you take its id and take the JSON data for it, for this example it's:

"mwEg":{"stx":"piped","a":{"href":"./HMS_Temeraire_(1798)"},"sa":{"href":"HMS Temeraire (1798)"},"dsr":[906,948,23,2]}

The dsr numbers (I think this stands for "data source range") are the wikitext positions of the beginning and end of the markup, and the lengths of the opening and closing "tag". In this example, the characters 906 to 948 in the wikitext are:

[[HMS Temeraire (1798)|HMS ''Temeraire'']]

…where the 23-character opening tag is [[HMS Temeraire (1798)| and the 2-character closing tag is ]].

Some of the other properties are documented at mw:Parsoid/Internals/data-parsoid (which also says that this is internal and subject to change at any time, but AFAIK it hasn't changed much since Parsoid was invented).

I hope this helps, or is at least interesting :) Matma Rex talk 18:37, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes!! This is super awesome. Thank you so much! I think using this will improve reply-link quite a bit. Enterprisey (talk!) 02:15, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on the Draft namrespace

As a user who has expressed an interest in the Wikipedia:The future of NPP and AfC, you are invited to join a discussion at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#Rethinking_draft_space. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 13

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (February 2019).

Hello everyone and welcome to the 13th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

I hope everyone is having a great year so far! --DannyS712 (talk) 15:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops must not undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather than should not.
  • A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.

Technical news

  • Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BRFA thought

Just a thought, be lazy like me and let the bots handle the moving/removing/relisting of completed BRFAs; I almost missed your latest approval (and the point about the bot flag) because it wasn't transcluded properly onto the "approved" list. Primefac (talk) 12:04, 6 March 2020 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

Primefac, thanks, good to know! Does that mean that step #4 ("Does the bot need a flag?") of User:SQL/How to close a BRFA should be removed? Enterprisey (talk!) 04:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it needs to be removed, because the directions do say that #3-4 will be done by the bot. Maybe move that line further down to make it more obvious... Primefac (talk) 14:15, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Easy BRFA transclusion error

Hello Enterprisey! I keep getting this when trying to create a new BRFA with the script. Could you please take a look? Thanks! --TheSandDoctor Talk 14:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah getting the same error. editToken on line 271 needs to be changed to csrfToken. Best, SD0001 (talk) 10:46, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thanks for letting me know! Enterprisey (talk!) 03:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bot possibly broke

If you check bots contribs, you'll see nothing in over 24 hours. A stable level 3 vandalism for that long does not seem right. You might want to check on the bot and see if anything brokedown. If nothing, then turn back on vandalism info. {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 17:39, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should be fixed now. Enterprisey (talk!) 01:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Enterprisey: I think it was partly fixed. The bot never reported level 2 level of vandalism. I don't know if this is a problem or not. Interstellarity (talk) 13:22, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you pinging this person on their talk page? Yeah, it's almost always on level 5, and stays like that during typical peaks like at 19:00 (UTC). It's not the same like before. {{replyto}} Can I Log In's (talk) page 18:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 14

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (March 2020).

Hello everyone and welcome to the 14th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Stay safe, --DannyS712 (talk) 05:48, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New NodeJS bot framework

Hi, while I know that you don't use Node.js for your bots, I thought you still might be interested in a new bot framework that I created - mwn. It's mostly written on the MWBot as a foundation with some enhancements copied from mw.Api, some original improvements like automated retries on maxlag and expired token errors, and finally I bundled in my own libApi.js functions for bulk processing tasks. It's intended to cover the limitations of the existing nodejs bot libraries - which have few features and use outdated JS techniques. Your contributions would be very much appreciated! See issues for a list of open tasks if you like. Regards, SD0001 (talk) 20:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

any way to scp files over to toolforge? I tried scp'ing them to login.tools.wmflabs.org but of course that didn't work

You asked "any way to scp files over to toolforge? I tried scp'ing them to login.tools.wmflabs.org but of course that didn't work"

Do you mean to an instance that is not tools.wmflabs? Not certain how you are accessing, but have you glanced at wikitech:Help:Access to Cloud VPS instances with PuTTY and WinSCP which has some configurations that may guide you. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the thing was I had only tried doing scp during the recent brief Toolforge outage (which would certainly do it!). I tried it recently with login.tools.wmflabs.org and of course it worked fine. Thanks for the helpful link! Enterprisey (talk!) 19:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EnterpriseyBot malfunctioning

We've been having to manually update {{vandalism information}} as of late (the bot is/was inaccurately reporting low RPM when it's actually high at the time, and occasionally it goes hours without updating). As having to go in and manually update it is tedious, I think I speak for many when I say the errors should be fixed ASAP. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 01:21, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed; I wasn't checking the edit summaries in a case-insensitive way - that is, the bot would only recognize "undid", not "Undid". Enterprisey (talk!) 22:18, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Motorola 68000

This is to report a cyberstalking editor, judging fromhis edit history, who reverted all edits on the Motorola 68000 page made by me on the 25th. Zac67 claimed to have changed just "1" of my edits, yet failed to identify which edit of mine was "unhelpful" - let alone why. 205.166.94.16 (talk) 08:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC) another Zac67 victim[reply]

You only made 1 edit to Motorola 68000. Also, this talk page is not the place to air grievances. Primefac (talk) 15:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit filter

Since there seems to be a lul, you may want to look at edit filter 2 and it logs as well. I'm testing some changes I hope will be harder to circumvent while easier to maintain. — Wug·a·po·des​ 01:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 15

News and updates associated with user scripts from the past month (April 2020).

Hello everyone and welcome to the 15th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter:

Miscellaneous

Hope everyone stays safe. --DannyS712 (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).

Administrator changes

removed Gnangarra • Kaisershatner • Malcolmxl5

CheckUser changes

readded Callanecc

Oversight changes

readded HJ Mitchell

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block?

Was that really necessary for User:41.176.246.114? Is there something I'm missing? Ed6767 (talk) 00:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ed6767, nah, it was a bug in the script I'm using. I have fixed the bug and it shouldn't happen again. Good spot, though. Enterprisey (talk!) 01:02, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying! Gl with the script. Ed6767 (talk) 01:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hate to bring this up again

I mean this with all due respects, but still, I feel I need to scrutinise your blocks as they seem overly harsh. Somebody getting a 2 week ban for that? Yet vandals get 31hrs, as they should, as the purpose of a block is to prevent disruptive editing when that person hadn't even broken the 3rr yet, nor did they receive proper warnings past a Level 1 good faith. If again, there's something I'm missing please say. You're an admin so can probably see way more about this user than I can. Thanks in advance! Ed6767 (talk) 02:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ed6767, sure, sounds sensible. I discussed this with someone more familiar with various methods of IP-hopping and 31 hours would probably work, so I'll reduce all the blocks to that. I had 2 weeks originally to discourage re-use of IPs for this attack; probably just one week would've worked. Almost all of the IPs had no prior use on here that I could see, otherwise two weeks would've definitely been overboard. Enterprisey (talk!) 02:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Tysm for clarifying! Sorry if I'm being annoying, I'm still learning all the ins and outs really, I've only been editing mainly for a month. Seeming it's featured, I'll probably propose page protection if it's vandalised again. Again, thanks for clarifying. Ed6767 (talk) 02:23, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pull request

Hi! Just to be sure: did you see this? I attempted to ping you at User talk:Enterprisey/reply-link#Translated reply link to portuguese, but maybe Echo didn't work? Helder 20:08, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, sorry about that! Thank you very much for the patch. I've been a bit busy lately. I will merge the patch and upload a new version shortly. Enterprisey (talk!) 00:41, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JoshGaming2003

It is odd/disturbing that this user came to continue the blanking of that IP talk page after the IP had been blocked and lost talk page access for edit-warring over said talk page. JoshGaming2003 created his account exactly upon the expiration of the block. It almost leads me to wonder if JoshGaming2003 is a sockpuppet of the IP. He is WP:PRECOCIOUS too, with the edit filter requests. Elizium23 (talk) 04:05, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hey Enterprisey! I just wanted to give a quick thank you for your help blocking some of those IPs over at Russian battleship Peresvet. I appreciate your help. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:53, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, and thank you for all your help with patrolling the articles! Enterprisey (talk!) 07:34, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undo speedy deletion

Hello. You have done a speedy deletion for User:Disha Gahlot/Sandbox/Dr Sumer Sethi which is quite unreasonable and wrong. The page is intended for a biography and is in no way created to promote anything like you've mentioned in your reason. It has facts and figures from reliable and published sources. Check in detail and properly before taking such extreme actions. Kindly undo, not at all acceptable. I was not done, there were still changes to be made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Disha Gahlot (talk • contribs) 02:35, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 May 19. —Cryptic 03:08, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason thiese IP are blocked indefinite

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/186.91.239.228 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/69.84.105.90 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/41.215.173.76 We rarely block IPs for indefinite periods not sure why these IPs are indefinitely blocked and the TFA vandal changes IPs alot so a edit filter would be better then blocking IPs indefinite 17:12, 19 May 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.Ayana (talk • contribs) [reply]

Good catch; my mistake. It was a bug in my script, and I just fixed it. I have unblocked the indefinitely blocked IPs. The IPs are blocked in the first place to prevent reuse, which the current vandal has shown will certainly occur otherwise. Enterprisey (talk!) 21:04, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Asqueladd...

(Original section header: Asqueladd: Undid revision 957274431 by Picklespitlizyr (talk) Unclear it is a better box. Less clean. You could look up for a photo of the monarch more akin to a mugshot, btw)

I not make "obviously retaliatory reports". Is true that this user makes strange edits. Thank you for put attention. --Picklespitlizyr (talk) 18:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TFA Vandals

Since you seemed to take care of this before: [11] (also reported at AIV). Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:05, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure to redact the TFA vandal's edits, since the vandal sometimes reuses the URL's! Randompointofview (talk) 01:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch; done. Enterprisey (talk!) 01:15, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Now I need help dealing with this person on Wikispecies. I'm getting the impression no administrators are monitoring the Administrator's Noticeboard there, and I think I'm the only one undoing the LTA's vandalism. --Randompointofview (talk) 01:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have reached out to some stewards. I don't think repeatedly rolling back the vandal without an edit filter or block to help out is the best allocation of effort. Enterprisey (talk!) 01:43, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

reported!!!

Oh no.. seems like you have been reported here... I can't imagine how annoying it must get with these persistent people.. Thanks. GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 02:29, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfD stats report down for a few days

Hi I haven’t been able to get an AfD stats report to run for a couple of days now. Is this a known problem? Thanks Mccapra (talk) 21:16, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Aw shucks. Looking into it; no immediately obvious issues. Sure hope we're not at the point where we need a rewrite... Enterprisey (talk!) 01:16, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It might be the replag, which was through the roof yesterday. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:16, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, but I was waiting 10+ minutes for it before giving up. Mccapra (talk) 09:18, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I just got it to run in about 2 minutes so you may we’ll be right. Mccapra (talk) 09:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yaay! working, thanks. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:30, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TFA vandal recycled IPs

Special:Contributions/104.172.108.167 appears to have been used very recently for the same purposes (they also vandalised the TFA of May 24th). Maybe longer blocks should be in order? Just saying. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As a VPN is clearly being used, blocking that IP for longer would've just caused them to hop to a new one. The fallout is minimized with 31 hours - heck, a shorter period would probably work as well. On the other hand, assuming it's a peer-to-peer VPN, longer blocks might discourage people from participating in the VPN. But those IPs haven't edited too much otherwise, nor is such a strategy likely to be within policy, so 31 hours sounds about right. Enterprisey (talk!) 00:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Many VPNs use open proxies that are blocked for long periods of times so it would not be a issue to block them for longer times since their edits need rev deletion and are seriously bad unless there is evidence that the IP is either not a proxy or a closed proxy 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 10:49, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not all VPNs should get the same treatment, so shorter blocks (or an escalating schedule) should be fine in this case. Enterprisey (talk!) 06:53, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

Hi Enterprisey, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Enterprisey. You have new messages at User_talk:Enterprisey/reply-link.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Aasim 10:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note on Wikipedia:User scripts/List

Thanks for your edits to Wikipedia:User scripts/List.

Nice to find a better location for this. Aasim 19:09, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

29 May 2020

Hello, Enterprisey. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:04, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

tvtropes.org filter

Several IPs have used tvtropes.org as a source on TFA and there needs to be a filter to prevent posting of tvtropes.org on the TFA pages 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 00:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done, sorta, due to the potentially high false-positive rate. Enterprisey (talk!) 00:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).

Administrator changes

added CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
removed Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL

CheckUser changes

removed SQL

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • A motion was passed to enact a 500/30 restriction on articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. Article talk pages where disruption occurs may also be managed with the stated restriction.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:27, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC/H issue

Issue

Can't accept drafts.

Tech info

Chrome & Windows. No relevant console logs to speak of (attached anyways). Issue persisted while on Firefox.

Console logs
Extended content
Some cookies are misusing the recommended “sameSite“ attribute 5
JQMIGRATE: Migrate is installed with logging active, version 3.1.0 load.php:376:171
JQMIGRATE: jQuery(window).on('load'...) called after load event occurred load.php:376:746
This page uses the non standard property “zoom”. Consider using calc() in the relevant property values, or using “transform” along with “transform-origin: 0 0”. load.php:5:729
This page is using the deprecated ResourceLoader module "jquery.tipsy". load.php:459:246
This page is using the deprecated ResourceLoader module "jquery.ui".
Please use OOUI instead. load.php:465:1009
JQMIGRATE: jQuery.fn.delegate() is deprecated load.php:376:746
Use of "wgPageName" is deprecated. Use mw.config instead. load.php:4:473
This page is using the deprecated ResourceLoader module "mediawiki.ui".
Please use OOUI instead. load.php:1:83
Use of "wgPageName" is deprecated. Use mw.config instead. load.php:4:473

From Firefox.

–MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 22:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MJL, I have since fixed this issue, I think (please confirm)? Enterprisey (talk!) 06:51, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Goings-on

For some reason your bot didn't archive Wikipedia:Goings-on today (I have done it now). Could you look into that? Regards, Armbrust The Homunculus 09:06, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the bot was logged out for some reason. I logged it in about three hours after UTC midnight, but I neglected to run all the tasks that it missed. Sorry about that. Enterprisey (talk!) 21:43, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The same happened today too. Regards, Armbrust The Homunculus 20:43, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Same issue. Time to rewrite the task so that it doesn't depend on me logging in, I guess. Sorry again. Enterprisey (talk!) 07:30, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:EnterpriseyBot/BOTREQ status and Bot Operator detection

How does the Bot determine Operator status? I ask because of this diff "Challenge Bot" (item #6) does not list me as a Bot Operator, yet I operate HasteurBot and Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/HasteurBot 15 is approved (along with many other tasks). Hasteur (talk) 17:16, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hasteur, it checks for Category:Wikipedia bot operators on your user page. Enterprisey (talk!) 22:15, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Might be nice if you documented that in the pseudo-template. I also think that if the page is being transcluded into WP project space, the "template" really belongs in the template namespace, which also means you should put the task up for a BRFA so that others have an opportunity to scrutinize/document. Hasteur (talk) 22:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Now anonymous IPs are adding Scott Alexander’s full name to Talk:Slate Star Codex

Now anonymous IPs are adding Scott Alexander’s full name to Talk:Slate Star Codex:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASlate_Star_Codex&type=revision&diff=964502244&oldid=964482884

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ASlate_Star_Codex&type=revision&diff=964502386&oldid=964502244

Time to clean up the history again (the name has already been removed by another editor) SkylabField (talk) 00:31, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like someone else has taken care of it, but thanks for letting me know! Enterprisey (talk!) 05:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Enterprisey/Archive_10"