User talk:Enriquepollack

Regarding edits to Henry Pollack

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Enriquepollack! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \.photobucket\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 06:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and will be removed. Thanks. Shadowbot 06:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop spamming Wikipedia. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing. Shadowbot 06:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Enrique-Pollack.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Enrique-Pollack.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Pollack

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Henry Pollack. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tabercil 02:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Henry Pollack. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tabercil 20:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Henry Pollack, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, attribution, and autobiography.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you. Tabercil 20:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

--Csodennc 02:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked for 24 hours for edit-warring. --Wafulz 04:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsolicited edits to User:Callelinea

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Do not edit other editors' user pages without permission. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for legal threats

I have blocked your account for making legal threats. See our policy at Wikipedia:No legal threats.

Meanwhile, I will drop at note at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard for you. Hopefully neutral editors can sort out any problems.

If you wish to be unblocked, please place {{unblock|'your reason here}} on this page. Thanks. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 06:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Enriquepollack (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will permanently refrain from legal threats, was unkown to me that I could be blocked for this, user CALLELINEA is using his edits on my site for petty gossip, I overreacted because I know him personally and he is using his edits to harm my reputation and minimize my career in radio and is trying to harm my public persona, he should be permanently blocked from all sites related to me, my family or my family home in Cuba-please unblock

Decline reason:

Declined for now as per my colleague Sandstein's very good remarks below. Please request unblocking again when you agree to the withdrawal of the previous threats. Please note that we don't tend to listen to requests to block other users within an unblock request - be reasonable — ⋐⋑ REDVEЯS 21:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have finally decided to respond to the many comments Mr. Pollack has made. My edits Have been based on facts not lies.. Nor have they been malicious or trying to minimize his accomplishments.. All the things that have been placed in there that I could not verify by published works I have removed. If he feels I have libeled him I would more than wellcome his threat to take me to court, that would then provide a published sourse for what he and I know a facts.. May I add that I wrote the article on his family home because I felt it need to be placed in it and no where in it was anything vaguely negative in it.. Perhaps instead of Mr Pollack only writting about himself he could put entrys of his family and their many contributions to Cuba. Such as his families tobacco business, his grandfather, and his great grandmother. Like I have stated in his delition page I do not feel his entry needs to be removed just edited. All opinions removed and only the published facts placed there. Callelinea 17:57, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The conduct of Callelinea is not at issue here. You have been blocked for making legal threats, and will remain blocked while these are outstanding. Refraining from making more threats is not enough. Do you withdraw your declaration that you intend to sue Callelinea? Sandstein 19:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #58758

is closed. Concerns about defamatory content should be sent to the Foundation. The email is info-en-qwikimedia.org, with a link to the page and details of the problem. To be unblocked, user must state that they have withdrawn the threat or concluded any legal action --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Any real life conflicts with any other user should be kept off and out of Wikipedia. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]