User talk:Endercase/draft
Compliance
WP:PRIMARY and WP:SPS, need to be fully complied with in the strictest interpretation prior to deployment of article.
additional links
Facebook and Twitter
Note these are apparently controversial sources:
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/12/twitter-facebook-censorship-mainstream-media-denial/
http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/the-answer-to-bias-bans-by-twitter-facebook/
https://www.facebook.com/help/community/question/?id=561009897371250
https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2808147
http://fortune.com/2016/11/16/twitter-ban-alt-right/
http://wmbriggs.com/post/17923/
www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/02/16/exclusive-twitter-shadowbanning-is-real-say-inside-sources/
www.infowars.com/proof-twitter-is-censoring-donald-trump-to-block-fundraising-efforts/
http://www.oneangrygamer.net/2016/07/twitter-shadowbans-censorship-and-antitrust/8173/
http://www.theverge.com/2017/2/16/14635030/twitter-shadow-ban-moderation
https://atrueprogressive.wordpress.com/tag/shadowbanning/
www.infowars.com/reddit-shadow-bans-infowars-as-fake-news-war-accelerates/
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/11ggji/can_someone_please_explain_to_me_what_shadow/
Claims SB was replaced in 2015 (it wasn't):https://techcrunch.com/2015/11/11/reddit-account-suspensions/
Sub for determining if a user is SB:https://www.reddit.com/r/ShadowBanned/
case of a shadowban in 2014 https://www.dailydot.com/news/unidan-reddit-shadowbanned-crow-ben-eisenkop/
https://news.fastcompany.com/reddits-new-blocking-feature-sounds-like-well-shadow-banning-4002329
Not really sure if it counts: https://twitter.com/durov/status/671357796730834945?lang=en
Periscope
https://www.reddit.com/r/periscope/comments/3fq7no/suddenly_no_one_can_see_my_comments/
Twitter and Periscope
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/152204980091/twitter-and-periscope-shadowban-update
general shadowbanning
http://lexicontexture.com/what-is-shadowbanning/
Term-"User Discouragement"
https://xenforo.com/help/discouraging-banning/
https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/youtube/aETNn7NZGj8%5B1-25%5D
https://productforums.google.com/forum/
https://boingboing.net/2016/12/02/chinas-we-chat-shadow-bans.html
Twit room
http://www.citadel.org/doku.php/documentation:system_administration_manual ("all messages posted will automatically be routed to the Trashcan (or whatever you call your twit room")
http://www.citadel.org/doku.php/documentation:appproto:system_config (more technical, implies that as a "room" the twit room may be accessed by authorized users (no mention of who is authorized))
http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netos/article.php/3740746/Set-Up-Basic-Groupware-With-Citadel.htm (says the "main floor" includes the trashcan (AKA twit room) no mention who can access)
A good discussion on the history; ends up claiming that the "twit bit" was the first of its kind. http://ask.metafilter.com/117775/What-was-the-first-website-to-hide-trolls-activity-to-everyone-but-the-troll-himself
http://www.citadel.org/doku.php/documentation:appproto:room_indexes_and_messages (looks like from here users are allowed to enter their personal trash room but maybe not "the trashcan"
Pokemon Go
https://www.pcmag.com/news/353923/pokemon-go-cheaters-will-be-shadowbanned https://mic.com/articles/177978/pokemon-go-shadowbans-niantic-reportedly-keeping-rarer-pokemon-from-cheaters#.muK57XrsE
"AI" management of Sleath banning
I don't have anything yet, but it is the only plausible explanation I can see for some of the above citations.Please add sources if you would like. Endercase (talk) 20:34, 15 March 2017 (UTC)