User talk:Ems 27 03
March 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Nikki Tamboli, Rahul Vaidya and Bigg Boss (Hindi season 13), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 13:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Rubina Dilaik, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ManaliJain (talk) 13:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Shruti Sinha moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Shruti Sinha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BrutBrother (talk) 15:43, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
June 2022
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Shruti Sinha. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bigg Boss (Hindi season 16), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nazar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Placename changes and Wikipedia policy
Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bangladesh/Archive 7#Placename changes and Wikipedia policy to understand why Wikipedia uses the spellings it does. --Worldbruce (talk) 09:23, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bigg Boss (Hindi season 16), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Imsaneikigai (talk) 09:46, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at MTV Splitsvilla (season 13), you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 17:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 21:43, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at MTV Splitsvilla (season 13). Ravensfire (talk) 14:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Drmies, FYI - similar edits were made after the returned from the prior block. Ravensfire (talk) 14:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
MTV Splitsvilla (season 14) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, MTV Splitsvilla (season 14), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bungle (talk • contribs) 20:54, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Persistent Disruptive edit on Bigg Boss (Hindi season 16)
Hello, this is too inform you that you have made several disruptive edits on the article. There is continuous violatation of WP:NOT and prediction of the future. Again and again editing of a contestant’s status to eliminated even before the episode was shot. Edits according to whims and fancies.
Here are some of your disruptive edits: 1) [1] 2)[2]
Several warning by me: 1) [3] 2) [4] 3) [5]
Apart from that you were also reprimanded by various other editors of the article on the article talk page and edit summaries like [6] This is to inform you that you might be blocked without warning if you continue to disrupt the article. Imsaneikigai (talk) 18:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
November 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) controversies, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 14:04, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at List of Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) controversies. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You MUST include a reliable when adding material about a living person to an article, especially an article like this. Ravensfire (talk) 13:53, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at MTV Splitsvilla (season 14). You CANNOT continue to add unsourced material like you have been. Further unsourced edits and I will ask for you to be blocked from editing. This needs to stop. Ravensfire (talk) 14:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jhalak Dikhhla Jaa (season 10). C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:43, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bigg Boss (Hindi season 16), you may be blocked from editing. ManaliJain (talk) 04:41, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Barishal Zilla School. Ravensfire (talk) 19:38, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Priyanka Chahar Choudhary
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Priyanka Chahar Choudhary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyanka Choudhary. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Eagleash (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Ems 27 03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I saw it on November 22,2022 that I have been blocked from editing on Wikipedia for 5 months. I have been working for months on Wikipedia and even contributed on numerous pages more than 600 times. I have always edited the pages woth correct informations but sometimes some "so called" old editors declined and removed by edits saying that the information I added were just from my "fansight" which totally not true. As a passion & wish to help people with information, I started working on Wikipedia and bow after months I'm facing this. This really feels very bad as a person and as an editor. So I from the core of my heart request to remove my block and let me do my work properly.
Decline reason:
You are only blocked from editing one article; your request sounds as if you believe you were blocked sitewide. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:37, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ems 27 03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I request to remove my block AGAIN. I appealed a removal which was declined by Daniel Case showing the reason that I was already blocked from editing one page. As long as I remember, the page is MTV Splitsvilla (season 13). I had the exact contestant list, Ideal Matches list and Dome Sessions list and I added that exact information according to the show. But some person (I forgot the user ID) blocked me from editing that page showing the reason that I edited that page according to my will & from a specific fan-base which is not true at all. If any administrator wants to check whether I'm lying or telling the truth, they may watch the episodes of the show and judge it by themselves. But I truly DON'T THINK IT AT ALL that whatever they did (blocking and the stuffs), it's totally unfair. I added this thing shortly in my last appeal but perhaps it didn't catch the eyes of the administrator who declined my appeal. I haven't just completed 600+ edits in a blink of eye. I know what the consequences could be if I put wrong information on Wikipedia. Perhaps, I don't have year-long experiences and 10000+ edit counts like some other ones but it doesn't mean that I'm unprofessional or I don't know the policy. I don't know how much I could explain to y'all through this but I really wanna let you know that this editing thing is my passion, I'm ( or I had been) doing it with lots of efforts. Kindly don't let that efforts, passion and determination down.
Decline reason:
You were blocked for edit warring and editing against consensus. This request does not convince me that these things will not repeat. Try making some edit requests on the talk page or otherwise establish a consensus for your proposed edits first. 331dot (talk) 11:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please place posts ar the bottom for proper discussion flow. 331dot (talk) 11:19, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Ems 27 03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I made my last edit at approximately 23:20 (Bangladesh standard time) on the page of Bigg Boss 16. When I started editing further at approximately 23:43, I saw that I have been BLOCKED from editing on Wikipedia. I would like to state that whenever I have been warned about anything I did wrong, I kept those in mind and tried as much as I can to mend them. I am contributing to some particular pages only. To be honest, getting into these situations for no reasons is really disappointing. I started working here with huge potential and enthusiasm but these things are breaking me down. I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST TO WITHDRAW MY BLOCK ON WIKIPEDIA. Let me do my work properly kindly and kindly don't let me down.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Speedy deletion nomination of Redirect 101
A tag has been placed on Redirect 101 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MB 04:31, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bigg Boss OTT s 1
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Bigg Boss OTT s 1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shoerack (talk) 18:52, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Page moves
Hello, Ems 27 03,
Please stop moving articles around multiple times. You should have a good reason to move an article and it is disruptive to keep moving them around and around, creating redirects that an administrator must come along and delete. If you do this again, you will face a loss of editing privileges so just stop. Consider a page move before you make it, discuss it on the article talk page and move a page ONCE. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:10, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
December 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at List of Bigg Boss (Hindi TV series) controversies. Your edit here adds unsourced information. You CANNOT do that on Wikipedia, you've been warned multiple times about making edits without sources. Enough. Next stop will be WP:ANI. Ravensfire (talk) 03:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
January 2023
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bigg Boss (Hindi season 16). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 14:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DMacks (talk) 20:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Ems 27 03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been working on Wikipedia for more than 6 months with 1300+ edits. I am contributing mainly in entertainment sectors specifically Bigg Boss & MTV Splitsvilla related pages. On January 28, 2023 I made an edit at approximately 10 pm GMT+6. On January 29 2023 at 1:20 pm GMT+6 when I returned to Wikipedia, I learned that I was blocked from editing by somebody for the edit I made. They said that I added irrelevant informations. I have been working for more than half an year and with more than a thousand edits, I know how thing are done here. However, people make mistakes and learn from mistakes. I apologize if I have made mistakes and will take care of it in future. I would like to request the authority yo unblock me and let me do my job.
Decline reason:
That's not why you were blocked, you were blocked for violating WP:BLP. I am curious as to what your "job" is, please read about conflict of interest and paid editing. 331dot (talk) 07:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have read the regulations properly and I would like to humbly request to unblock me and I'll keep the matters in mind in future. Ems 27 03 (talk) 14:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Ems 27 03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Requesting for the third time to remove the block. I have said that I learnt my mistake and will take care of it. So, I would like to ask the authority go lift my block.
Decline reason:
This still doesn't address the concerns regarding your block. You also did not address the possible COI and paid editing question above as well. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:06, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ems 27 03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Respected Authority, I would like to draw your kind attention to the fact that I have been working on Wikipedia for more than half an year with more than a thousand edits. I was blocked from editing perhaps a week ago for some reason. Now that I have learned from my mistakes, I would like to request to lift my block
Decline reason:
You still haven't addressed the possible WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:BLP issues. "For some reason" means you don't know why you were blocked in the first place. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 18:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ems 27 03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked more than 2 weeks ago for some issues, specifically WP:COI, WP:BLP & WP:PAID issues. Now I have studied the regulations about them and learned my mistakes. Therefore, I would like to request to unblock me please.
Decline reason:
Stating that you have read the regulations does not convince admin that you understand why you were blocked. Instead, we need you to demonstrate this new knowledge. In future unblock requests, please answer the following questions:
- What is Wikipedia's WP:BLP policy and why did you edits violate this?
- How will you change your editing habits to avoid violating WP:BLP?
- Have you ever been paid or compensated by anyone to edit Wikipedia? If so, what articles did you edit that led to this payment/compensation?
Feel free to ping me if you have any questions. Z1720 (talk) 02:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please put new posts at the bottom of the page to preserve the chronological order of the discussions. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:31, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Ems 27 03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
respected Authority, PLEASE UNBLOCK ME 💔
Decline reason:
Closing as a duplicate request. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ems 27 03 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
been more than a month since I've been blocked. Realizing my mistakes from the past, I would like to request the authority to lift my block and run for my passion. Please don't break the spirit
Decline reason:
This doesn't answer the questions asked by Z1720 and others above. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I'm removing TPA at this time, as this is yet another unblock request that doesn't get WHY the user was blocked. This is becoming a time sink at this point. I will leave for another admin to review as I have declined once already. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:48, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:MTV Splitsvilla (season 14)
Hello, Ems 27 03. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MTV Splitsvilla (season 14), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:MTV Splitsvilla (season 14)
Hello, Ems 27 03. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MTV Splitsvilla".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)