User talk:Elizabethhope89
Temidayo Isaiah Oniosun moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Temidayo Isaiah Oniosun, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 21:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
Elizabethhope89 (talk) 08:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC) Hi, @ Lapablo (talk) Can you please elaborate what kind of sources and citations he needs to remain published. He really have lots of articles online like in Forbes Africa, Bellanaija and TEDx. So that I will be more familiar with general notability guideline. Thank you and God bless.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Temidayo Isaiah Oniosun (May 8)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Temidayo Isaiah Oniosun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Temidayo Isaiah Oniosun, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hi, @ An@ss_koko(speak up) I have already added more reliable sources as what you have said. Elizabethhope89 (talk) 14:44, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Temidayo Isaiah Oniosun has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
An@ss_koko(speak up) 13:35, 16 May 2020 (UTC)A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Elizabethhope89. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! An@ss_koko(speak up) 12:30, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Zolana Rui João
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Zolana Rui João requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://africanews.space/leaders-of-space-agencies-in-africa-angola/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 13:33, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Paid contributions
Hello Elizabethhope89, the nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic.
Are you being paid for your contributions to Wikipedia? If so please see our guidelines for paid editors and our guidelines for editors with a conflict of interest. Paid editors are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose their employer, client and affiliation. You can for example post the disclosure on your user page on the form "This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by [employer] for their contributions to Wikipedia".
Paid articles can be submitted for as drafts review with the Articles for Creation process, but should not be directly created in article-space.
– Thjarkur (talk) 09:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Please don't use fake paid-for sources when creating articles. – Thjarkur (talk) 09:29, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Thjarkur Hello, thanks for reminding me, I didn't know it was a fake sources, the next time I will be more careful in contributing. Thanks again! Elizabethhope89 (talk) 04:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Happytalism
Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Happytalism. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
Hello Elizabethhope89. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Elizabethhope89. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Elizabethhope89|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS 💬 03:30, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.