User talk:Eatprayswimm

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Eatprayswimm, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Eatprayswimm! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Lightbreather (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Eatprayswimm. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by StarryGrandma (talk) 16:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. –Davey2010Talk 20:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 21:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading Userboxes & Icons

Hi, Please refrain from putting twinkle/rollbacker/file mover/reviewer userboxes/icons to your userpage as you don't have them so thus it's misleading,
You only add the icons/userboxes once you actually have the rights,
Thank you, –Davey2010Talk 01:55, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Taylor Lianne Chandler shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. slakrtalk / 05:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding transgender issues and paraphilia classification (e.g. hebephilia), a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

--NeilN talk to me 17:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

A kitten for you and your hard work.

Allaboutjane8181 (talk) 04:36, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]