User talk:Earthynotes

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

December 2012

Hello, I'm Darkwarriorblake. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Speed Racer (film) because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:00, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Speed Racer (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:06, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Speed Racer (film), you may be blocked from editing. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:06, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Speed Racer (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:07, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wachowski's

The consensus of previous discussions is that a work should represent the credit given at the time of its creation, Cloud Atlas is the first and so far only film where she chose to be credited as Lana, and on the works in between they are either credited as The Wachowski Brothers or The Wachowskis, depends on the film, and in some cases credited individually as Larry and Andy. We do this to represent history as it happened as the films are not biographical; if Picasso changed his name to Timothy you wouldn't go paint over his signature on his paintings for example. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:46, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Re: Wachowskis

Ah, I see, I see. Thank you for clarifying this - I was unaware of prior consensus on the issue. Thank you for your insight!

Earthynotes (talk) 01:51, 24 December 2012 (UTC)earthynotes[reply]

Earthynotes, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Earthynotes! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]