User talk:EUROLinguistics

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

EUROLinguistics, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi EUROLinguistics! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Second Language Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Norris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that the journals prefer English language. There are similar journals in other languages, eg. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik.Xx236 (talk) 10:58, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

style & contents

Please note several aspects of our article contents practice and article style:

  1. We never use terms of quality or importance such as "seminal" unless there is a reliable third party reference for it. Similarly, in order to claim that a person is the originator or most important worker in a subject, a 3rd party reference is needed.
  2. When the name of a researcher is important enough to be mentioned in an article on a subject, they are usually notable enough for an article about them. to indicate this, give their full name--not just the family name--and make the link. When there is no article, the red link indicates that an article is needed.
  3. We try to avoid academic and educational jargon.
  4. Journal names and book titles are written in italics.
  5. We link only the first occurrence of a term in an article
  6. We do not link common terms that any reader will understand.
  7. Avoid one sentence paragraphs.
  8. The editor in chief of a journal or president of an organization is significant (and it is valuable to list all preceding people in these positions, because holding such a position for a major journal or organization is sufficient justification for an article about the individual) The other editorial staff or officers are usually not considered significant here.
  9. When you list presidents or chairs or editors or holders of any other positions, give the relevant date; even if it is the current year, it will need to be updated.
  10. If we list books, we include full information about publisher and date; we distinguish author and editor; if there are co-authors or co-editors, we list them.
  11. In an article, we do not repeat the name of a person or organization more than once a section unless needed for clarity. The best substitutes are such terms as "the university" (note:lower case), "it", she or heor "they".
  12. In any article , we do not repeat the name of an organization more than once a section unless needed for clarity. The best substitute is, for example, the university (note: lower case) or just it

Please note in general the various copyediting change I have been making. DGG ( talk ) 18:32, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "EUROLinguistics", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing this form, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 18:18, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of European Second Language Association for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article European Second Language Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Second Language Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 02:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Rosa Manchón

Hi, I'm Rosguill. EUROLinguistics, thanks for creating Rosa Manchón!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article is well written, but it is unclear if the subject meets notability guidelines such as WP:GNG or WP:NACADEMIC. Please provide either additional in-depth coverage of Manchón in reliable sources (to satisfy GNG) or evidence that Manchón is a widely cited and/or influential researcher in her field.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

signed, Rosguill talk 20:37, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of applied linguistics journals) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of applied linguistics journals, EUROLinguistics!

Wikipedia editor Ajpolino just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Could you merge this page into List of linguistics journals? (Or if you'd prefer, have the subsection on applied linguistics from that article, link to List of applied linguistics journals instead?) Seems unnecessary to have duplicate lists in two places.

To reply, leave a comment on Ajpolino's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ajpolino (talk) 07:11, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, EUROLinguistics. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Martin Bygate

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/linguistics/about-us/people/martin-bygate, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:21, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Second language acquisition

Template:Second language acquisition has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:11, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]