User talk:Dsp13/Archive 92

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 85 Archive 90 Archive 91 Archive 92 Archive 93 Archive 94 Archive 95

Wikidata weekly summary #559

Wikidata weekly summary #560

Women in Red March 2023

Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Mobile phone readers may only see the article "lead" – take some time to make it shine!
    Include something to keep people reading.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Wikidata weekly summary #561

Wikidata weekly summary #562

Wikidata weekly summary #563

Merge proposals

If you want to merge articles, and think that the idea is pretty uncontroversial, you can go ahead and be bold by just merging the articles. Sometimes you might want more input. In those cases, a discussion about a merge takes place on the talk page of the "target" article (the one that is being merged to) . Joyous! Noise! 20:05, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Thanks very much - I thought that was the general procedure. In the case under discussion at AfD, it doesn't look to me as though a merge is called for anyway! Dsp13 (talk) 21:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #564

Quickstatements Activity for P21

Hello, I've just seen a large number of items I've created for humans assigned possibly inaccurate P21 values based on their given names, which were largely batch-assigned based on their labels. I've taken some steps to undo some of your related Quickstatements batches to prevent people from being harmed through misgendering. I see that these edits are still coming through my inbox. Would you please stop and revert any Quickstatements P21 batches where you assign a P21 value to a person based on the sex/gender associated with a given name they have been assigned based on the labels for their Wikidata items? This is not sufficient evidence for a person's gender identity, and reinforces a biased, binary view of gender which does not reflect the complexity of gender identities in the world. --Clements.UWLib (talk) 21:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi there, thanks very much for raising these concerns. I replied to you on my wikidata talk page, and suggest we talk there to keep discussion in one place. After replying to you I halted ingestion. I haven't mass-reverted yet, as I'd like to find wider consensus. Dsp13 (talk) 13:49, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2023

Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging