User talk:Dr. B. R. Lang
A new start
Dr Lang, I have moved the old contents of your talk page to /Archive, removed the mainspace informational boxes from your user page and deleted the "proposed article" page, since the consensus at the noticeboard discussion is that it represents an end-run around our deletion policy - please see WP:CSD#G4.
I have taken these actions because the disputes over your trying to create an autobiographical article, along with various disputes resulting from your point of view in respect of various issues which are matters of long-standing dispute , have resulted in a situation where it's going to be quite hard for you to contribute without continued strife.
So, by making your user page more obviously a user page, and by archiving past disputes while leaving them visible for transparency, I am trying to help you to make what might be considered a fresh start. Wikipedia is always looking for editors who can help to add good quality, neutral content with citations from reliable independent sources. I see that you are a physician and that you are committed to doing work for the public good. This should be a good fit for Wikipedia, provided you can remember to check your baggage at the door and respect the opinions of others with whom you might have philosophical differences.
I would like to suggest to you that you look to edit in areas where you have professional expertise and uncontroversial opinions - I am surer there are many articles around the area of primary care that could do with the kind of care you lavished on your proposed article, and there may be many important figures from the history of the mainstream medical bodies whose articles could do with expansion.
I hope you will find these suggestions welcome, please feel free to ask me any questions on my talk page. Guy (Help!) 15:00, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Bruce Rusty Lang article
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Help me write the Bruce Rusty Lang article. If there is sufficient information suitable for Wikipedia, I will write an article. See User talk:Dr. B. R. Lang/proposed article. Chergles (talk) 18:28, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for your consideration and effort. I'll get some additional information and references together to add to it. I appreciate your eiditorial input and objectivity. Sincerely, Rusty Dr. B. R. Lang (talk) 20:09, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you again for your effort. I am very reluctant to edit this into mainspace in its current form. There is too much unreferenced material. Unlike an autobiography, Wikipedia requires references. If you do it, some administrator may try to block you for it. Chergles (talk) 23:48, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- I understand, and I thank you for your effort and input. You're welcome to edit it down to whatever is better. I've added additional info knowing that it would be edited. I still intend to expand it when I find more references. The autobiogarphical excess serves as a personal template for some other work I'm doing. It's helping to jog my recollection of the chronology of distant life events. One thing I'm still looking for is ref. to when I walked out on strike with other employees for higher wages from the Dallas Morning News when I was 15 years old (I was working there underage illegally). The case went to the Supreme Court, and we won, but I was in Viet Nam by then. Thanks again! I appreciate your interest and work. Sincerely, Rusty Dr. B. R. Lang (talk) 14:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
The draft of the article you proposed has been moved to: User:Dr. B. R. Lang/proposed article. It is currently in the Administrator's forum, receiving further edits. Thanks again; I appreciate your input and contributions. Sincerely, Rusty Dr. B. R. Lang (talk) 01:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Moving on
Dr. Lang, I thought the note I left and the tone of the discussion on the admin board was sufficiently clear. The article you propose is not compliant with our sourcing and notability policies, and to continue to agitate for an essentially autobiographical article is unlikely to play well with the community. People are being very careful to be polite, but the answer is unambiguous. I have suggested ways in which you can exercise your desire to help Wikipedia, and which will be less controversial. People have been polite and kind and tried not to bite you, and as a result you may be misreading the signals. The signals are that this article is not going to fly. Please choose a subject other than yourself to write about. Guy (Help!) 15:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
August 2008
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Infanticide. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 02:29, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note. I did not add any commentary to that article, but in good-faith I did add links within the 'See Also' paragraph of Infanticide to the related articles on Massacre of the Innocents and Abortion. I did not notice any mention or clarification of the two links elsewhere in the article, other than the image of the Massacre of the Innocents fresco at the article's introduction. I appreciate your input. Thanks again. Dr. B. R. Lang (talk) 10:58, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
In a recent edit to the page Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Thank you. Organisation is correct, unless you're American. The organization is not American. Toddst1 (talk) 02:31, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- You are correct about the spelling, and your point is well made and appreciated. However, I only added a "Z" in the spelling of a redirect for the sake of American users. There is also a link established to the article from the "SCO" acronym disambiguation page. The infobox in this article also uses the "organization" spelling, and I noticed that some other contributor attempted to change the spelling in different areas of the article, but I agree with you that it should stand as it is. Thanks for your input an interest. Sincerely, Rusty Dr. B. R. Lang (talk) 10:58, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Userpage content
Hello, Dr. B. R. Lang. Your user-page User:Dr. B. R. Lang appears not to be in compliance with the WP:UP guideline since it contains excessive amount of personal information. WP:UP#NOT explicitly lists the following as an example of inappropriate userpage content: "3. Excessive personal information (more than a couple of pages) unrelated to Wikipedia". Your userpage is well above that in length and all of the info there is about your personal information rather than about your Wikipedia contributions. Please bring your userpage in compliance with WP:UP. While Wikipedia users are given fairly wide lattitude in managing their userpages, in unambiguous cases of noncompliance with WP:UP a user-page may eventually be deleted. Thank you, Nsk92 (talk) 04:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Second iteration
Please be advised that wikipedia user pages are just an another tool to serve wikipedia. By no means wikipedia is a web hosting service for your personal webpage. It may reasonably include various personal information which may help other editors understand your editing preferences end expertise, and thus make cooperation easier. But what I see in your user page in my opinion fails to comply with the guidelines from Wikipedia:User page.
Please trim your personal information to an extent reasonably useful for wikipedia purposes. Mukadderat (talk) 00:52, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
P.S. On a personal note, I am quite impressed with your eventful life, although your genealogy leaves a gist of hoax... Mukadderat (talk) 00:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- I second this. We have discussed this in detail, Dr Lang, and you have been told that Wikipedia is not a free web host or a vehicle for self-promotion. You need to start making meaningful non-promotional contributions to the encyclopaedia or your user page will most likely be deleted. Guy (Help!) 06:55, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Dr. B. R. Lang
User:Dr. B. R. Lang, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dr. B. R. Lang and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Dr. B. R. Lang during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Nsk92 (talk) 20:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC) Nsk92 (talk) 20:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Dr. Lang,
I am presently working on Air Force covert operations in Laos here in Wikipedia. I once worked for the air attache's office as an intel specialist at about the same time you were in Laos.
I wish to clear up some details before I proceed, as I do not wish to unnecessarily edit or distort your work. Also, I am seeking internal consistency between Wikipedia articles.
It was my understanding that Palace Dog was a USAF umbrella operation that included Project 404 and Raven FACs. The former was numbered so that it would appear to be a routine supply operation; the latter was call-signed to appear an operation within South Vietnam.
In reading the Wikipedia article you wrote on Project 404, you made it appear an army operation. Security conditions being what they were in Laos, Project 404 may have been multi-service and not strictly Air Force run. However, I wonder what authority you can quote for it's being at least partially Army-run?
Georgejdorner (talk) 23:00, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Hi George. Thanks for your interest, and for your note. Project 404 was an operation under U.S. Ambassador Sullivan which included both Army and Air Force military attaches. I was an assistant Army Attache (ARMA)and I provided communications liason assistance to both the ARMA & Air Force attache (AIRA) working out of Long Tieng, Laos (LS-20A). Dr. B. R. Lang (talk) 21:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed that you created the article Bill Queen and mention that he died on January 15, 2009. I cannot, however, find any sources to this effect. Could you provide one? Thanks and Cheers, CP 20:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- His family is still trying to arrange his funeral, etc. His comrades in the Special Forces community are the primary source, and so far we know that Pastor Bill Rimondi (mentioned on Bill Queen's page draft) is unable to attend his funeral. As soon as some outside source publishes his obituary I'll add it. Dr. B. R. Lang (talk) 00:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Bill Queen
I have nominated Bill Queen, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Queen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 02:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Bruce Allen Berg
I have nominated Bruce Allen Berg, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Allen Berg. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 16:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Gerald Hamilton 2008.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gerald Hamilton 2008.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Note
Dr. B. R. Lang, I see that you've been putting more and more information into the description of File:Gerald Hamilton 2008.jpg. I appreciate the effort that you're putting in, and am sympathetic to the emotions involved, considering that Mr. Hamilton just recently passed away. I mean no disrespect, but this really isn't what Wikipedia is for, especially because the image is not being used in any articles, and no sources are being provided to allow verification of the information. A better place for this information might be at the genealogy wikia, have you taken a look? If not, I highly recommend it: http://genealogy.wikia.com --Elonka 17:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Dear Elonka, Thank you. That's an outstanding suggestion. I sincerely apreciate it, and I shall follow up on that when time permits. It is interesting that you perceived emotions involved in the drafting of the info text with that photo. I usually think of my writing as being overly technical or dull. I'm doing this as a hobby, and learning as I go. Right now my time is filled with obligations in Dallas and Nashville. My computer, hard drive info, and other office equipment in Nashville were all recently misappropriated, so the infomation I've attached to that photo has been added piece-meal to the photo from different locations in Texas and Tennessee. Again, I appreciate your kind note and input. Thanks, Rusty Dr. B. R. Lang (talk) 00:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- You are most welcome. As for the emotion I perceived, it wasn't so much because of the writing, which is in the proper tone. Instead, I noticed that you had been creating several articles about veterans, and especially when writing about a veteran who recently died, this often (not always) indicates an emotional commitment, and a desire to memorialize. It's a worthy goal, though sometimes Wikipedia is not the best place to achieve it. BTW, as regards the pages that were deleted, if you would like me to retrieve the deleted information and send it to you so you can put it on wikia, I would be happy to help with this. That way you wouldn't need to re-write everything! Let me know, --Elonka 18:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Cardiology task force is looking for editors to help build and maintain comprehensive, informative, balanced articles related to Cardiology on Wikipedia. Start by adding your name to the list of participants at Cardiology task force Participants. ECG Unit (Welcome!) |
-- Addbot (talk) 00:13, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Maen. K. A. (talk) 09:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
question
Hi,
Would you be interested in volunteering some time and expertise to help the Wikimedia Foundation in a collaboration with the National Institutes of Health? I unfortunately do not have a lot of details to give at this time, but in short, I'm looking for a group of Wikimedians (primarily US or UK based, but that's not a requirement) that have interest or expertise in various medical fields, to help participate in a Wikimedia Academy event with the NIH. Even if you don't think you'd be able to attend the event, but would be interested in helping out online in any capacity, I'd love to hear back from you. Please leave a message on my talk page at User talk:Swatjester if you are interested. Thank you. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 14:56, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
File:Dr B R Lang Yucatan CMDA.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dr B R Lang Yucatan CMDA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
About this edit, may I suggest that the paragraph's "topic" sentence be moved back to the start? It seems that the reader would not know just why that paragraph is in that article until after reading most of the paragraph. Only after reading facts about recent events related to same-sex marriage, which at first seem not relevant to the Census, does the reader find an explanation that the Census won't count same-sex marriages. That was my impression when I first read the paragraph, and that's why I edited it to state first the "what" followed by the "why." Michael Patrick (talk) 20:17, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Green Beret
Hello Doctor - I cam across a photo of yours in which you appear to be wearing a Special Forces Patch? Were you / Are you a green beret ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.240.237.113 (talk) 19:11, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
....... Yes, I was. The Special Forces patch ("Flash") in that photo is the USA 6th Special Forces Group. 21:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:39, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of 2007 Laotian coup d'état conspiracy allegation for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2007 Laotian coup d'état conspiracy allegation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 Laotian coup d'état conspiracy allegation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Int21h (talk) 20:08, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
A new medical resource
Please note that there is a new freely accessible medical resource, MedMerits (to which I'm a medical advisor) on neurologic disorders. A discussion on ELs to MedMerits and medical ELs in general is currently in progress ("Wikipedia and its relationship to the outside world"). Presto54 (talk) 06:47, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
New medical organization
Hi
I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.
Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.
Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 07:36, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
 | The Wikipedia Library (talk | edit) Research tools and services Outreach Get involved  ...Support Open Access...  |
The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.
- Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
- Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
- If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)
Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The file File:Gerald Hamilton 2008.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Uploaded for Special:Diff/268109346. No other use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC)