User talk:Diamond Head green
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. El_C 03:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. El_C 03:54, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Diamond Head green, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Diamond Head green! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC) |
October 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad, you may be blocked from editing. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:14, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Iconoclasm. Largoplazo (talk) 17:35, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Cow vigilante violence in India, you may be blocked from editing. Stop removing sourced content and sources Panda619 (talk) 03:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Hell in a Bucket (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
March 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. El_C 22:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Someone else in my absence did all these edits. I assure you such activities won't be repeated in future , so please give a chance Diamond Head green (talk) 07:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- That would be much more likely had there not been a consistent history of these issues. The WP:NOTME defense does not excuse the pattern here. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 12:16, 17 March 2020 (UTC)