User talk:Deadflagblues

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nick Robinson

Please do not start an "edit war" through revision comments. Please start a discussion on the Talk page. Also, although I agree that improving references is a good thing, it is not the Wikipedia way to remove substantive content while references are being improved. Please would you therefore restore the content and add, if you like, a "citation needed" template so that work of improvement can be done, rather than simple deletion. Thank you. Chelseaboy (talk) 21:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've put our exchange of views on the talk page so that others may contribute to this discussion. Hope you will find that constructive. I am conscious that we are all bound to assume good faith, practise civility, preserve content and improve rather than deleting, and avoid repeated reversions. Cheers. Chelseaboy (talk) 13:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures) , as you have to the article Criticism of the BBC, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. If the mail says it can you link where, thanks Natet/c 09:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Deadflagblues. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]