User talk:DavidJacques

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Customer experience, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Ronz 18:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Customer experience

I've nominated the article Customer experience for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Customer experience satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Customer experience. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Customer experience during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. --Ronz 01:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of other's comments on Talk:Customer experience

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Customer experience, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Ronz 17:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Funny, now that you mention it, how much editing out of my comments you've done on your own User_Talk:Ronz page. -- DavidJacques 17:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't allow uncivil comments to remain on my personal talk page. You may not have noted at the top of my talk page it says

*Do not make personal attacks or use the page for harassment.

*Sign your post using four tildes

Comments which fail to follow the rules above may be immediately deleted.

--Ronz 17:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You deleted "Your more -constructive- editing is welcome". And a few other civil comments from subsequent posts. Sincere apologies for forgetting about the tildes. -- DavidJacques 17:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And I felt the comment was uncivil and harrassing, so I removed it. --Ronz 17:46, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Now that you mention it, uncivil applies as well to your purely speculative comment that the Customer experience article might "very well have been edited by someone in [my] company". I think one of the reasons you didn't manage to remove it by Speedy_deletion was because almost everything fits the Non-criteria: -- DavidJacques 18:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You may have noticed that I removed the mention of your company. --Ronz 18:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As for speedy deletion, why are we discussing things that did not happen? --Ronz 18:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]