User talk:Dannyg88

July 2013

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. [1] MrOllie (talk) 12:10, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Persistent link spamming

Please stop adding promotional material to articles with links to your website. See Wikipedia:Spam to understand where you are going wrong. Many thanks. Jamesx12345 (talk) 12:23, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 12:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dannyg88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I tasked my assistant who is new to wikipedia to add more content and references for any article we wrote. We are google news accredited and part of a system that gets press releases ahead of most news publications. Our site is an authority and ahead of most other news outlets (providing its fashion/beauty related). We found lots of the wikipedia pages were missing the latest info that we have reported on. My assistant apparently added a few links and it seems some overzealous wikipedia users flagged this account as spam (perhaps my assistant needs a little more practice/training in adding reference links?). We are a legitimate news authority site and adding content to the relevant wiki pages that is accurate and up to date. Please unsuspended the account. Dannyg88 (talk) 12:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The users who flagged this account for "spam" are most certainly not "overzealous". As you have now admitted that this account is being shared, it shall remain permanently blocked due to a violation of our username policy. We do not want your spam, and you may never link to your own website (✉→BWilkins←✎) 13:49, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.