User talk:Danman80

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

July 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Steve Novak with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:32, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at MarShon Brooks with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:32, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:IronGargoyle, you may be blocked from editing. -- Luke (Talk) 00:49, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to MarShon Brooks. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:00, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rjd0060 (talk) 01:08, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Danman80 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was trying to add viable information and then asked what I did wrong and I was attacked by gargoyle with racial slurs so I retaliated.

Decline reason:

Your vandalism and personal attacks show that you are not here to collaborate on building an encyclopedia. Kinu t/c 01:51, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Not saying that you are right or wrong, but you should not of retaliated. Anyways, the unblock request does not have anything to get sysops to think that you will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and you will make useful contributions instead. ~~Ebe123~~ → report 01:53, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]