User talk:Daniel sugden
Please excuse my rudeness
Speedy deletion nomination of Maia Dunphy
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Maia Dunphy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 18:48, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
November 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Keanu Reeves, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 18:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
I've been reviewing your edits and you are purposely introducing false information into articles, such as listing Charlize Theron's birthdate as 1968 rather than 1975 [1].
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Charlize Theron, you may be blocked from editing. Yworo (talk) 18:45, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lara Stone, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yworo (talk) 23:58, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
Just wondering why you keep adding that Keanu Reeves and Charlize Theron are married, since they're not. That's been reverted, btw. If you keep doing that, you'll probably get blocked. If you could explain the reason for your actions, it might help. Thanks. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 19:24, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nick Frost, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 19:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Daniel Radcliffe with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. waywardhorizons (talk) 19:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Content blanking
Could you please explain why you are blanking images from articles? With no edit summary provided or explanation on the talk page it appears disruptive. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 19:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Please stop messing with the image in this article. The place where you are moving it causes the next major heading to be indented. I will consider continuing to move it to be edit warring. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yworo (talk • contribs)
- Daniel, please, please respond to the questions you're being asked. It would really help. If you continue to make controversial edits without discussing them, you could be blocked. I implore you to engage in dialogue. Ignoring questions or warnings won't do you any good in the long run. Thank you. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 00:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Eddie Murphy, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Also without addressing any issues and again using no edit summaries, you also changed {{pp-move-indef}} to {{pp-semi-blp|small=yes}} on Rowan Atkinson and changed {{BLP sources|date=April 2010}} to {{pp-semi-blp|small=yes}} on Mike Myers. Shearonink (talk) 19:57, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
Stray protection templates
Please stop adding protection templates to articles like Peter Sellers. The page isn't protected, and just adding a template doesn't make it so. Article protection can only be done by admins. Furthermore, BLP doesn't apply to Sellers, who has been dead for quite a while. Favonian (talk) 09:38, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
January 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rowan Atkinson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop screwing around with those protection templates! Favonian (talk) 11:29, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Nick Frost, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 20:08, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 17:05, 5 January 2012 (UTC) When you return to Wikipedia after your one-week block expires, please keep in mind that you must be very careful when editing Biographies of living persons, such as when you changed a birthdate for Carlos Ferro with this unsourced edit. In the future only make edits that are backed-up and accompanied by verifiable and reliably-sourced references. Thank you, Shearonink (talk) 17:26, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- I have to admit I have some serious concerns regarding competence issues here. I suggest Daniel seek a mentor when the block expires. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 18:20, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rowan Atkinson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop changing that image caption. It is not what the image description says. In view of your track record, you are one step away from an indefinite block! Favonian (talk) 17:29, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- And you are still pulling images out of articles without any explanation. This is either a competance issue, or purposeful disruption. Either way, a re-block is likely if the disruption continues. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:38, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Johnny Gat
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Johnny Gat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Paste Let’s have a chat. 18:37, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
February 2012
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 20:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)