User talk:DailySuffragist

Welcome!

Hello, DailySuffragist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 16:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... How do I make "short citations" using the Visual Editor? When using different pages of the same book as a source, I cannot figure out how to cite the book on first reference with specific page numbers or none, as appropriate, and then cite the same book again pointing to different page numbers. Thank you. DailySuffragist (talk) 04:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DailySuffragist. Hm. Do you see an example in an existing article, please? (I see that when reusing a citation, the page numbers are the same in all instances; this doesn't sound like what you need.) Gryllida (talk) 02:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Gryllida: I believe DailySuffragist refers to {{rp}}, as I've done in Special:Diff/1004355208. If so:

Cite the entire book, no page numbers, in Visual Editor
Add a template, either using the button or by typing two open curly braces {{
Add {{rp}} and the page number
In another sentence, use the cite function to re-use a citation
Add {{rp}} and the other page number as appropriate. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 05:54, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sara Andrews Spencer has been accepted

Sara Andrews Spencer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 06:16, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sara Andrews Spencer

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sara Andrews Spencer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://documents.alexanderstreet.com/d/1011002066. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:36, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, DailySuffragist. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Zudo ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:15, 12 August 2021 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]