User talk:Cstoczyn

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, Cstoczyn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Camille Bonora, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Feinoha Talk, My master 22:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Camille Bonora

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Camille Bonora requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Feinoha Talk, My master 22:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-pasting credits

Please stop indiscriminately copy-pasting credits for various shows into articles. In addition to this being questionable from a copyright perspective, much of the information is trivial and does not belong in the article.

For example, one article ended up listing who was responsible for "Graphic Blandishment". It is highly unlikely that independent reliable sources discuss the graphic blandishment. The general audience of Wikipedia has no idea what graphic blandishment is and does not care who did it.

If you disagree, please discuss the issue here. - SummerPhDv2.0 00:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cstozyn, you are still doing this nearly three months after the issue was brought up to you. If you truly do not understand why what you are doing is not appropriate for Wikipedia, please discuss this issue here, otherwise it will be assumed you are doing so disruptively (which, if done for a long enough period, can get you blocked). I've gone ahead and reverted all your recent edits copy-pasting credits as well. Thank you. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 16:13, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Camille Bonora

The article Camille Bonora has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:38, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Camille Bonora

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Camille Bonora requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:38, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Claymation Easter

I have moved this article to your userspace so that you can work on it. It's located at User:Cstoczyn/A Claymation Easter. ... discospinster talk 15:52, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ... discospinster talk 16:08, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You have been warned several times about copy and pasting unreferenced and trivial credits information, and you continue to do it. You may be blocked permanently for this disruptive behaviour. ... discospinster talk 16:12, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Claymation Comedy of Horrors for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claymation Comedy of Horrors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claymation Comedy of Horrors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 23:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cstoczyn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Basil Hears a Noise

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Basil Hears a Noise, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Lard Almighty (talk) 14:59, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sesame Songs: Rock & Roll

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sesame Songs: Rock & Roll requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. !dave 20:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elmo's Sing-Along Guessing Game

Hello, Cstoczyn. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Elmo's Sing-Along Guessing Game, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

!dave 20:24, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

B.C.: The First Thanksgiving moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, B.C.: The First Thanksgiving, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 19:46, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Let's Eat! Funny Food Songs

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Let's Eat! Funny Food Songs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 18:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying licensed material requires proper attribution

Hi. I see in a recent addition to Muppet Meeting Films you included material from the Muppet wiki. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Campfire Sing-Along

Hello, Cstoczyn. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Campfire Sing-Along, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Hzh (talk) 11:58, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Information icon Hello, I'm Hulmem. Your recent edit to the page Peter Falk appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. hulmem (talk) 04:33, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muppet Meeting Films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Hunt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Camille Bonora

The article Camille Bonora has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 16:16, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Camille Bonora) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Camille Bonora, Cstoczyn!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Some of the citations need the addition of titles.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Alfred Hitchcock: The Art of Making Movies (attraction)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Alfred Hitchcock: The Art of Making Movies (attraction), Cstoczyn!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've just fixed some minor issues and found two new references. It would be awesome if you'd find some more information about the topic and reference it. Good luck!

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robert G. (talk) 01:09, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James J. Kroupa

Hello, Cstoczyn. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, James J. Kroupa, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Icewhiz (talk) 11:33, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Information icon Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to The Nightmare Before Christmas, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. The Old JacobiteThe '45 00:31, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sing-Along Earth Songs

Notice

The article Sing-Along Earth Songs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable program. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a database or mirror of IMDb.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 00:35, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sesame songs: Rock and Roll

Notice

The article Sesame songs: Rock and Roll has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a database or mirror of IMDb or Muppet Wikia. Wikipedia is not everything

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 19:58, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable films and excessive detail.

Hello. You have created a series of articles on Sesame Street specials and other video programs of dubious notability. Please read what is generally considered notable for inclusion on Wikipedia. We don't have articles on things merely because they exist. Subjects generally require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject in order to merit an article. I have tagged some of your articles for deletion under lack of notability. Your efforts may be better spent at websites outside of Wikipedia, such as http://muppet.wikia.com, which does not have the same notability criteria (see Rock & Roll!). See Wikipedia:Alternative outlets for other projects.

Secondly, you have been repeatedly warned, and blocked, for repeatedly inserting extremely excessive detail regarding film credits, cast, crew, etc. Please note that Wikipedia is first and foremost an encyclopedia, not a database or product directory. It is no ta place for indiscriminate information, and Wikipedia is not for everything. People read encyclopedias to learn significant details, not the rote information on the back of the box, or manufacturer's information, or purchase information. Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film for how to write better articles and avoid excessive, indiscriminate detail. Note that IMDb, however is a database, yet is generally considered a questionable source for the purpose of Wikipedia, per WP:RS/IMDB and WP:IMDBREF. From your contribution history it appears you have never commented outside of articles, that is, have never engaged with other editors to seek help, ask questions, or gain consensus. I invite you to explore the links in the Welcome message at the very top of your Talk page (this one), and to seek help and guidance. Let me know if you have any questions, or feel free to ask questions at the Teahouse or Help desk, where volunteers can answer your questions. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 20:27, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Three Bears and a New Baby (Sesame Street)

Notice

The article Three Bears and a New Baby (Sesame Street) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable television program. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a database or mirror of IMDb. Wikipedia is not everything

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:33, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim Henson's Play-Along Video

Notice

The article Jim Henson's Play-Along Video has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film/TV program. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a database or mirror of IMDb or Wikia. Wikipedia is not everything

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:35, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive credits lists

You've been asked several times to stop copy-pasting massive lists of unsourced credits into Wikipedia, and you've been blocked over it once already. Please listen to other editors and stop doing this. If you think this is something that Wikipedia should be doing, raise the issue at a central location and get consensus for it, perhaps at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film or Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:07, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jim Henson's Play-Along Video, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fred Newman and Bruce Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jim Henson's Muppet Video

Notice

The article Jim Henson's Muppet Video has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable video (with currently poor sourcing).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:41, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inner Tube moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Inner Tube, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:59, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Inner Tube (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:00, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Cstoczyn! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:00, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Inner Tube has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Inner Tube. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 10:01, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hi-Tops Video, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Babar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Miss Peach of the Kelly School to Miss Peach

Hello Cstoczyn, I know you've been working for 10 days or so on the Miss Peach of the Kelly School article. Unfortunately there doesn't appear to be much published to base it on. Notability requires coverage by independent reliable sources. The one source is use, written by one of the puppeteers, is not independent. I've searched and found very little in other sources. Because the article is unlikely to be kept if nominated for deletion I suggest merging it to the Miss Peach article and then redirecting there. I've started a discussion on the Miss Peach of the Kelly School talk page. Of course, if you or others can point to sources I'm not aware of I'm ready to reconsider. 15:48, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:B.C.: The First Thanksgiving

Hello, Cstoczyn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "B.C.: The First Thanksgiving".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 06:12, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pee-wee's Playhouse Christmas Special (special) moved to draftspace

IMDB is not considered a reliable source because it is crwod-sourced. You can't base the entire article on IMDB information. Please search out reliable sources that can be used as references; at the moment, the article does not have sufficient sources to remain in mainspace. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:40, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pee-wee's Playhouse Christmas Special (August 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
IMDB is not a WP:RS. It's not clear that this is independently notable from Pee-wee's Playhouse.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 17:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:22, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cstoczyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

to be forgiven

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 10:29, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|apologize for my actions Cstoczyn (talk) 11:50, 16 August 2018 (UTC)}[reply]

  • Your apology is appreciated, but what is it you are apologizing for? In order to unblock you, those reviewing your request need to know that you understand what it was you were blocked for, will not do it again, and tell what it is you will edit about if unblocked. 331dot (talk) 12:01, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock| will never do sock puppetry again Cstoczyn (talk) 20:33, 16 August 2018 (UTC)}[reply]

Never do sockpuppetry again? That's it? What about the endless copy and pastes of crew lists? You've been talked to about it multiple times and blocked for it before. You've done it anonymously too [1] Doing it with three accounts is bad, but you're apparently never going to stop your disruptive behaviour. Ribbet32 (talk) 21:55, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|won't do endless copying and pasting of crew lists, showing disrupt behavior, and abusing multiples accounts ever again Cstoczyn (talk) 23:08, 16 August 2018 (UTC)}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cstoczyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

won't show disrupting behavior and abusing multiple accounts ever again, including copying and pasting crew lists Cstoczyn (talk) 14:21, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You had five, five!!!, open unblock requests. None of them were remotely convincing. If you wish to be unblocked, please read WP:GAB. And in the future, one unblock request at a time. Yamla (talk) 12:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cstoczyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be unblocked from Wikipedia, because I want to apologize for my actions, including sock puppetry nonsense, showing disrupting behavior and emails, abusing multiple users' accounts, and copying/pasting cast and crew lists, and I promise that it will never happen again. From now on, I will be making good edits on Wikipedia by following the rules and safety guidelines, reading and making new articles, and helping other Wikipedia users. The articles that I would like to edit are actors, actresses, movies, television, and other things that I'm interested in. The steps that I will take before editing is read what the articles are all about and learn about the facts and information about them. Please forgive me. Cstoczyn (talk) 14:46, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You should stop abusing multiple accounts for 6 months, then use WP:UTRS to request an unblock under the standard offer. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:47, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have revoked your ability to send email. Your use of email is abusive. --Yamla (talk) 20:40, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is there a particular reason you are fixing your request every so often? While I am not reviewing another of your requests, you seem to be telling us what we want to hear and I'm not sure you really understand. You state what you will not do, but you don't state what you will do. What articles do you want to edit? What steps will you take to not do what you have been blocked for? 331dot (talk) 12:50, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Since 331dot's comment about repeatedly tweaking the unblock request without substantially addressing the question, Cstoczyn has tweaked the unblock request without substantially addressing the question 14 times. I think there is good reason to believe there is a WP:CIR question here. - SummerPhDv2.0 00:54, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to remove your talk page access until this is resolved; there is no need to continually tweak your statement. 331dot (talk) 12:38, 27 August 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Cstoczyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22471 was submitted on Aug 27, 2018 14:39:00. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 14:39, 27 August 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Cstoczyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22664 was submitted on Sep 15, 2018 01:15:39. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 01:15, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Muppet Sing-Alongs

Notice

The article Muppet Sing-Alongs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable video line

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --woodensuperman 12:15, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Camille Bonora for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camille Bonora is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Bonora until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TomStar81 (Talk) 21:48, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pee-wee's Playhouse Christmas Special

Hello, Cstoczyn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pee-wee's Playhouse Christmas Special".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:44, 13 February 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Cstoczyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24112 was submitted on Feb 28, 2019 18:31:27. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 18:31, 28 February 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Cstoczyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24116 was submitted on Feb 28, 2019 20:28:16. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 20:28, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I received your email; you were told in your last UTRS appeal decline what you need to do to possibly be unblocked: a) list all of your sockpuppets, b) explain why you socked, the circumstances that led to it and why this was wrong and c) convince the blocking administrator that this will not happen again. You will need to make another UTRS appeal- and I urge you to provide the requested information or you risk losing that avenue of appeal as well. Please do not email me again about this matter. 331dot (talk) 14:14, 7 March 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Cstoczyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24216 was submitted on Mar 07, 2019 18:07:46. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 18:07, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I've declined this, once again directing them to do as 331dot has asked above. I also made it clear that if yet another appeal failed to do so, further appeals to UTRS will be ignored. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Cstoczyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24226 was submitted on Mar 08, 2019 01:57:34. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 01:57, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access restored

I've restored your talk page access, but please don't send English Wikipedia admins any more emails. Your talk page access email access was revoked on English Wikipedia for a reason, and trying to get around that by sending emails from other projects will probably just lead to sanctions on other projects. Before you make a new unblock request, please read WP:GAB. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:46, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cstoczyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be unblocked, because I want to apologize for my sock puppetry behavior. My sock puppetry list includes copying/pasting credits from YouTube videos into articles, showing disruptive and repetitive behavior, abusing multiple accounts, creating articles that never exist, etc. I have Asperger's syndrome. It is a disability that causes an individual to do stuff over and over again. The reason why that I want to be unblocked is that I want to stop sock puppetry nonsense and make good edits on articles. Please forgive me. If so, unblock me, please. Thank you. Cstoczyn (talk) 00:07, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. Yamla (talk) 12:02, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"causes an individual to do stuff over and over again". This was a big part of the problem. How can we be sure, despite your disability, you won't ever do this? You won't ever copy and paste credits, you won't show repetitive behaviour, you won't abuse multiple accounts, etc.? Given your disability, there may be no way for you to guarantee this will never happen again. If so, that would be sad, but we'd have to leave you blocked. But if you have specific reason to believe this will never happen again, let us know so another admin can consider lifting your block. --Yamla (talk) 11:15, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cstoczyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be unblocked from Wikipedia, because I want to apologize for my behavior. My sock puppetry actions include making disruptive edits, abusing multiple Wikipedia accounts, creating articles that already/never exists, copying/pasting credits from YouTube videos into articles about movies, TV, actors, actresses, etc. The reason why that I want to be unblocked is that I have Asperger's syndrome. My concerns for this block is that I've been blocked for almost a year. From now on, I promise that I will never show sock puppetry behavior again. Please forgive me. If so, unblock me, please. Thank you. @NinjaRobotPirate: Cstoczyn (talk) 13:23, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not given a valid reason to lift the block. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) I'm afraid that Yamla comment above still applies. - FlightTime (open channel) 13:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Cstoczyn, if you are unable or unwilling to immediately address this, I'm afraid you are in danger of losing talk page access again. Look, there's no shame if Wikipedia isn't the place for you. But if you think it is, you need to specifically and directly address why we can be absolutely sure you'll never repeat your repetitive behaviour again. --Yamla (talk) 13:51, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Rather than address these concerns, you've hidden the concerns from your unblock request. Please, in your next edit, specifically address these concerns. --Yamla (talk) 19:25, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As you have refused to address these concerns, I have revoked talk page access once again. Another admin will be along shortly to review your request. They may choose to reinstate talk page access if they wish. If they choose not to, and choose to decline your request, you are welcome to request reinstatement of your talk page in another six months via WP:UTRS, if you are willing to address the concerns at that time. Remember, there's no shame in Wikipedia being the wrong place for you, if that's the case. It's frequently challenging here, and may simply be too frustrating for you to deal with. If so, we sincerely wish you well elsewhere! If you wish to contribute here and can address the concerns, though, you are welcome to do so via the route I outlined. --Yamla (talk) 19:45, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Cstoczyn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25677 was submitted on Jun 21, 2019 19:59:53. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 19:59, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Cstoczyn"