User talk:Cssiitcic/Archive 5

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulal

Please follow up. Now the article is properly titled, you might have better luck finding sources. (I did) - Mgm|^(talk) 09:01, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kids on Strike!

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kids on Strike!, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no indication of why this book is notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 21:25, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikilove

Hi, thanks for the smiley; it's appreciated. If you ever need help with anything. talk to us.  Chzz  ►  01:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Cssiitcic! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 940 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. David Huerta - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:44, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Bad faith

If you believe Civil Lines (Delhi Metro) should be deleted, then every Delhi Metro station should be deleted. Your tagging was in bad faith. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.66.122.119 (talk) 20:12, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

GA nomination of Orthodox Church

You had not completed the GA nomination process by adding {{subst:GAN|subtopic=name of the subsection on this page where the article is listed}} on article talk. Also, currently the article is a quick-fail candidate as it has no many valid tags, fails significantly in "Factually accurate and verifiable" clause of Wikipedia:Good article criteria. So, I am removing your nomination of the article from the Wikipedia:Good article nominations. The article needs significant improvement on the references front, please re-nominate only after addressing this significant issue. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 00:33, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

First Love Illustrated and I Joined a Teen-Age Sex Club

These articles have been sourced. The banners can be removed. Thanks! SingToMePlease (talk) 02:44, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:ASL Silver Medal.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ASL Silver Medal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --NW (Talk) 00:59, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Academic Sports League for deletion

The article Academic Sports League is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academic Sports League until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NW (Talk) 01:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Academic Sports League for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Academic Sports League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Academic Sports League until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NW (Talk) 04:30, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Asl logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asl logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Cssiitcic/Archive 5! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey