User talk:Cool Binge

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

January 2021

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Krack (film), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -Shift674-šŸŒ€ contribs 14:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Krack (film), you may be blocked from editing. SP013 (talk) 15:14, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Krack (film). Stop adding huge plot. It should be under 700 words as per WP:FILMPLOT. You are being disruptive Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:27, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Cool Binge! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! -Shift674-šŸŒ€ contribs 14:50, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Film plots

They must not exceed 700 words per WP:FILMPLOT. Also bringing the attention of SP013 to this editor. --Kailash29792 (talk) 12:20, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit, you have not only re-added the bloated plot of over 2400 words despite the intimation, but also removed the {{long plot}} template. If you keep doing this, you may lose your editing privileges. -- Ab207 (talk) 18:38, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Temper (film) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Temper (film) was changed by Cool Binge (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953891 on 2021-01-27T07:34:29+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:34, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Krack (film) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Krack (film) was changed by Cool Binge (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911129 on 2021-03-17T05:48:20+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Krack (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Carmel School, Padmanabhanagar, you may be blocked from editing. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:27, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted) Cool Binge (talk) 13:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Cool Binge, even so, you still need a reliable source; you alone are not reliable. (Sorry if this sounds rude, Iā€™m not trying to be harsh.) -Shift674-šŸŒ€ contribs 19:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

F3 cast

Re this edit, while I noticed that you added cast from F2, you'd still need a source to confirm that these actors are reprising roles in the sequel. That cannot be assumed, see WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 14:30, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh , thanks for the info Ab207 Cool Binge (talk) 14:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Information icon Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Oka `V` Chitram, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Anarchyte (talk ā€¢ work) 14:54, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sarkaru Vaari Paata, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please do not add cast without sources; it is already explained to you above. Ab207 (talk) 12:13, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sarkaru Vaari Paata, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source; also Don't add your commentary in the article space. please use talk pages; Diff: [1] Ab207 (talk) 13:54, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tanikella Bharani filmography moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tanikella Bharani filmography, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 02:25, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Cool Binge. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tanikella Bharani filmography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:11, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cool Binge. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tanikella Bharani filmography".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:44, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]