User talk:Coal Press Nation

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Coal Press Nation, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi Coal Press Nation! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

You Welcome

Proposed deletion of Lil Kem

The article Lil Kem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lacks significant coverage in reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stanleytux (talk) 07:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Information icon Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Burna Boy, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Stanleytux (talk) 09:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Patoranking into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Versace1608 (Talk) 14:06, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Lil Kem. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I NotifyOnline 13:54, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Information icon Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Nickki Praize. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I NotifyOnline 13:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage violation

Don't copy and paste contents from my userpage. Write your own biographical summary. You did the same thing to the Patoranking article. If you want to contribute to Wikipedia, write in your own words. Versace1608 (Talk) 18:14, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Kem (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Lil Kem (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KJ «Click Here» 02:40, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nickki Praize (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Nickki Praize (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KJ «Click Here» 02:44, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ricky Osagie

Hello, Coal Press Nation,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ricky Osagie should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricky Osagie .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Versace1608 (Talk) 13:31, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

You need to stop copying and pasting text from other Wikipedia articles. Learn to be original and write in your own words. Secondly, STOP adding self published blog sources. They are not reliable. YOUR blog is not reliable as well. I encourage you to read more about self published sources here: WP:USESPS. If you continue to add unreliable sources to articles, I will report you to an administrator. Versace1608 (Talk) 19:47, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Burna Boy songs

The articles you created for Burna Boy songs are not notable. 1.) They fail WP:GNG because they have not received significant coverage in reliable source to warrant stand alone articles. 2.) They also fail the requirements of WP:NSONG. If you are going to create articles pertaining to singles, make sure the singles meet the requirements of WP:GNG. I am going to redirect the articles you created to the parent article (The L.I.F.E article). You are still new to Wikipedia, and there are lots of things you need to learn. Make sure you read Wikipedia's notability guidelines and adhere to its requirements to prevent your articles from being deleted or redirected. Versace1608 (Talk) 00:32, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Emmy Gee

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Emmy Gee, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://notjustok.com/2013/10/28/emmy-gee-ft-ab-crazy-dj-dimplez-rands-and-nairas/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Emmy Gee

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Emmy Gee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Stanleytux (talk) 16:05, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Lil Kem

Information icon A tag has been placed on Lil Kem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Stanleytux (talk) 13:44, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Emmy Gee

I already told you. You cannot edit Emmy Gee because of your close relationship with him. Please read WP:COI. If Emmy Gee was born in SA, his origin would be SA because that's where his musical career started. Same as Usher. He was born in Dallas, but is origin is Altanta because that's where his musical career started. "Origin" for musical artist on Wikipedia means "The town, city etc., from which the group or musician originated (that is, the place where the group was founded, or where individual performer started their career, should it not match the location of their birth). If the place is not known, specify at least the country. Do not add a flag icon. Omit the country if it does not differ from that specified at the field "birth_place"." Read about origin at Template:Infobox musical artist. Only one social network link is allowed to be added to a BLP article per WP:ELMINOFFICIAL. You need to learn to follow the rules here on Wikipedia. If you not know the rules, ask someone for help. Versace1608 (Talk) 14:32, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about YSG Entertainment

Hello, Coal Press Nation,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether YSG Entertainment should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YSG Entertainment .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Versace1608 (Talk) 14:51, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emmy Gee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emmy Gee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmy Gee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stanleytux (talk) 15:08, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Last Warning

You need to stop copying and pasting what I write. Write in your own words!!! The next time I see you do this, I will report you. Just because I think Emmy Gee is notable doesn't make Lil Kem notable. Also, if other editors don't feel like Emmy Gee is notable, the article will be deleted. You shouldn't get your hopes up high. You need to stop writing articles on people who are not known and focus on people who are. Versace1608 (Talk) 15:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Information icon Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Peridon (talk) 15:49, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The only deletion tags you are allowed to remove from your own articles are Proposed Deletion {{WP:PROD]] ones. You've been warned about AfD tags - now leave the speedy ones alone please. Peridon (talk) 15:50, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Empire Mates Entertainment may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |[[Young Skales]] |Skales]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lil Kem for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lil Kem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Kem (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stanleytux (talk) 16:59, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lil Kem

Hello Coal Press Nation,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lil Kem for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Versace1608 (Talk) 17:37, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Skales

Ease off on using Tooxclusive, NotjustOk, Jaguda, and etc. These websites do not make a subject notable. Please target Nigerian newspapers next time. Also, don't put words in caps. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a blog or forum. Versace1608 (Talk) 19:49, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Made Men Music Group

Hello, Coal Press Nation,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Made Men Music Group should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Made Men Music Group .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Versace1608 (Talk) 12:50, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Made Men Music Group

Template:Made Men Music Group has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Versace1608 (Talk) 13:16, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Niyola has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Versace1608 (Talk) 16:57, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Niyola Putting On Eme Cloth.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Niyola Putting On Eme Cloth.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Versace1608 (Talk) 17:00, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Ever since you started editing here, you've either copied and pasted my text while changing few things in them or copied and pasted text from other websites. I hope you read the tags I left on your userpage. YOU need to learn to write in your own words. Since your English is not good, you should focus on writing articles in your Wikipedia:Sandbox first and then request help from Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests. Copying and pasting other people or website's text is not permitted on Wikipedia. Like I told you earlier, learn to ask if you have questions.

Please do not go around creating record label articles for artists who have one. Check the internet first and make sure that the label has recieved significant coverage in reliable sources. Just because D'banj founded DB Records doesn't make it notable. Same thing goes for HKN Music, Star Boy Entertainment, Made Men Music Group, etc.

Lastly, regarding the Niyola image you uploaded. Non free images of Living people are often deleted from Wikipedia because the consensus is that a free image could be taken of here, or someone who has already taken an image of here could be convinced to release it under a free license. Do not uploaded Non free images of living people. If Niyola was dead (God forbid), the image you uploaded would be fine. Versace1608 (Talk) 18:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Niyola Putting On Eme Cloth.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Niyola Putting On Eme Cloth.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 19:00, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Stop creating new talk pages with the artists real names. This is not the norm on Wikipedia. A single with a remix do not need two separate articles. They both belong in one article. I am going to redicrect the Rands and Nairas Remix article you created. Versace1608 (Talk) 20:19, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Information icon This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Versace1608 (Talk) 22:38, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion need not be done for money; we do not permit accounts to be used for promotion of any kind, not even for up-and-coming new acts nobody ever heard of but which you think are really cool. Additionally, account names should not match those of websites and blogs, as that is promotion of those blogs and websites. Accordingly,

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.
Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

  • Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
  • Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
  • Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
    • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
    • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 14:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Record Label.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Record Label.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:09, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Chidinma Ekile

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Chidinma Ekile. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Chidinma. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Chidinma – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Versace1608 (Talk) 22:26, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Damini Ogulu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Damini Ogulu. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Burna Boy. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Burna Boy – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Versace1608 (Talk) 22:27, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Eniola Akinbo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Eniola Akinbo. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Niyola. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Niyola – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Versace1608 (Talk) 22:28, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Iyanya Onoyom Mbuk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Iyanya Onoyom Mbuk. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Iyanya. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Iyanya – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Versace1608 (Talk) 22:29, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Olubankole Wellington

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Olubankole Wellington. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Banky W.. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Banky W. – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Versace1608 (Talk) 22:30, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tiwatope Savage Balogun

Hello Coal Press Nation,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tiwatope Savage Balogun for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Steve Lux, Jr. (talk) 17:34, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Made Men Music Group Logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Made Men Music Group Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:55, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:YSG Entertainment

Template:YSG Entertainment has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. SpinningSpark 23:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coal Press Nation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because i understand what i am blocked for and i will not do it again Coal Press Nation (talk) 17:43, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The fact that you tried to evade your block using the sock puppet Coal Press Nation 1 (talk · contribs) demonstrates that you do in fact not understand why your editing is disruptive. Favonian (talk) 18:06, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The fact that you're constantly creating new accounts, User:Sirking07 and User:‎Blaze8724 to try to get your draft DJ Kentalky accepted, I'll get your draft guaranteed that it won't get accepted (at least by not one of your sock's submissions.) So stop socking. WikiPancake ✉ 📖 13:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Here's one thing: Contributions of unwanted spam are not acceptable on Wikipedia. On the other hand, you've been getting out of your block by unambiguously creating sock accounts, and doing the same edits as this account. If you want to go back and make constructive edits, you'll have to read the standard offer. Making more unblock requests will not be guaranteed. Good luck! 2600:1:B119:5303:296E:447F:7FEA:23BF (talk) 02:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Coal Press Nation,

How have you been? It's quite unfortunate that you have to choose between using the wrong path to get the right things done, and lowering your ego inorder to regain the trust of the Wikipedia community. I understand where you are coming from, and I can still recall what led to your first block. I know you might be thinking, will I ever get unblocked? will things ever be the same? Believe me, when I say I have been in your shoes, I committed even greater crimes against the Wikipedia community, yet I got unblocked, the secret is your sincerity, just come out clean. You are such a great asset not only Wikiproject Nigeria, but the entire Wikipedia community at large. Please don't allow little things stop you from contributing to your world. You can still be everything you want to be on Wikipedia, once you demonstrate that you've learnt from previous experiences. That I can say for a fact. Please send an unblock request with all sincerity in your reasons. Darreg (talk) 10:35, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coal Press Nation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First of all. I would like to greet every one in the wikipedia foundation or community also thanking those who want me to be back here. To be sincere on wikipedia this was my first account created in 2014 that is 2 years ago I was Blocked indefinitely on wikipedia by Orangemike due to WP:PROMOTION. Back then i know nothing about wikipedia policy it was hard then understanding the rules as a new comer in 2014 few do I know. To be truthful I began creating account on wikipedia ever since my first account was block, I thought it was possible following the wrong way in contributing to wikipedia but now i found no good about that. I was told in the past by @Favonian: "unblock request can only be made from the master account". Due to my stupidity I did not look into that. I have destroyed a lot of articles on wikipedia and disruptive editing. Reading all my mistakes in the past and the massages leaving by my talk page, I have come to apologize to everyone here, I hope I will be unblock someday and also hope I will be forgiven. This is my promise to the wikipedia community:- * I will never involved my self again in WP:PROMOTION * I will never harass any editor or be involved in an personal attack * I will never be involved disruptive editing nor be part of Vandalism * I will never create multiple accounts again on Wikipedia just to contribute to the community * I promise to make useful contribution to wikipedia I strongly believe am back here on wikipedia for good and peace. I apologize to everyone on wikipedia to forgive me especially Huon, WikiPancake, Zppix GB fan, CambridgeBayWeather, Bbb23 and many more. I made my mistake in the past and promise never to engage my self in all this mistakes. I will be very happy and appreciated if i can be unlock on wikipedia. A promise to all administrator on wikipedia that my contributions to wikipedia will be for Good forever and in the future. Coal Press Nation (talk) 2:54 pm, November 13, 2016, Sunday (UTC−6)

Decline reason:

You were engaging in sockpuppetry as recently as two days ago as Music Boy50. If you wish to resume editing sometime the future, the standard offer is available. Katietalk 14:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coal Press Nation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@KrakatoaKatie: I know its hard to believe but i just need to surrender my self and say the truth noting but the truth. I read the link which you gave me about the Wikipedia Standard offer. I agreed that I engaged my self in sockpuppetry but not "recently as two days ago". I stopped editing wikipedia on the (16 June 2016) This are accounts which i have created as a sock

  • Nichoal Nde
  • Nicholas Nde
  • Coal Press Nation 1
  • Emmanuel Nick. Nde
  • Nonso Nde
  • Bello96 (last account)
Few months ago I told a friend of mine about wikipedia and he decided to join the community as his nick name Yung miraboi mark, He was a good friend of mine back then, He was a new comer who joined wikipedia on the (13 June 2016). Actually I deceived him, telling him to make his opinion on this AFD Sugarboy which makes Editors think he was a sockpuppetry of me. When he found out that his account was blocked he was mad at me, How foolish I am, to deceive my friend. I hope he finds a place in his heart to forgive me, I am not worthy to be called his friend for what i did. He began to engage himself in sockpuppetry. I don"t need in creating sock account because i know it would make things worst here including the investigation

By creating this accounts:-

  • Patricia marco david
  • Markzy90
  • Cynthiakruz
  • Skito58
  • Clara279
  • Scoutt88
  • Zoroki
  • Jamzy4
  • Blaze8724
  • Music Boy50
Editors on wikipedia where thinking this account where from me. Actually i have to keep quite and face the wikipedia policy for my mistakes Wikipedia Standard offer. Been long i contributed to wikipedia but i always receive notifications via my email every time am being mentioned here. I apologize to everyone on wikipedia including the Administrators, I hope you unblock me and find a place to forgive me. I will be very happy to be back on wikipedia for Good --Coal Press Nation (talk) 19:56, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. You just sent me an email and evaded your block to notify me. And the sender's email address was: Coal Press Nation <yungmiraboimark@...>. And now you claim that your "friend", totally not yourself, "decided to join the community as his nick name Yung miraboi mark"? We're not that stupid, sorry. Huon (talk) 20:45, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have noting to say here Huon believe, it or not "yung miraboi mark" is different from me. I am not making any unblock request again. It is hard for human being to believe. It is better I leave wikipedia for good, I have apologize to every one here. For more information you can Google search the user name and see the different between me and yung miraboi mark. What I just wrote here is more than a truth, I rather tell that to my mom and dad than coming here no one can believe you. Good Bye to wikipedia, If possible my account should be deleted here. --Coal Press Nation (talk) 21:52, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Huon: I have decided to come back here. What did you want me to do?. For me to be unblock on wikipedia --Coal Press Nation (talk) 15:20, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not blatantly and transparently lying would be a good first step. The Standard Offer is available, but it's not a guarantee. Huon (talk) 20:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coal Press Nation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Huon: Please I will never engage my self in sockpuppetry or block evasion again. I promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban. Please forgive me and all the administrator on wikipedia. I am just a student that love editing and writing. Please let this be my second chance, I promise to make all wikipedia admin proud of unblocking me, once again I apologize to everyone here Coal Press Nation (talk) 14:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Go six months without socking and without lying, and then apply for WP:STANDARDOFFER. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:44, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coal Press Nation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Greetings to everyone on wikipedia my nick name on wikipedia is Coal Press Nation I was block 2 years ago and also was declined few months ago due to my act on sock puppet. Actually I don"t remember much on wikipedia because I left few months ago so that i can still have a hope to be unblock by not creating any more sockpuppetry account or block evasion. Please admins you can check my log details I have repented from my past, I promise never to do what lead to my block. Actually I was back here to also be part of the family with good manners. I promise my unblocking me on wikipedia will be good editor and to follow the policy. Please forgive my past belive me am new and also repented. I will be very happy I can unlock here. Will be very glad to be part of the wikipedia community again, Thanks.Coal Press Nation (talk) 04:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per previous admins, wait until 6 months before the WP:SO can be made. This means no socking, no other accounts, and no more unblock requests until this. Further repeated requests may result in loss of talk page access privileges. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request For A Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coal Press Nation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedians and admin, I know have gone against the law of Wikipedia by creating suck puppet account which are listed above my talk page. I here by plead to every one on Wikipedia never to go against the rules and regulations on Wikipedia. I hope if i can be unblock, I promise never to be a Bad faith. Now i realize all my mistakes. Thanks Coal Press Nation (talk) 10:23, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were told to wait six months. You did not. You will not be considered for WP:SO unless we are convinced you are acting in good faith. You clearly aren't, if you refuse to follow RickinBaltimore's restrictions, above. Yamla (talk) 11:48, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • I also suggest that, once the six-month period does end, you are finally honest about *all* of the sock accounts you have used (including the ones you blamed on a friend). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:04, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, having said that, I then went and did a check on all of your known socks and discovered you continued socking after your previous unblock request was declined. I have, therefore, revoked your ability to edit this talk page and so bring this waste of volunteers' time to an end. Your last resort is probably WP:UTRS after waiting at least six months from your last sock edit - but I wouldn't rate your chances as high even then. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Coal Press Nation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21219 was submitted on Apr 14, 2018 22:16:23. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 22:16, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coal Press Nation (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was told by an admin few weeks ago via my email that my talk page request have been approved via my previous request on my talk page, Am here to plead for the unblock of my account, I was block due to sock (creating of multiple account and coursing of violence with editors). Have created a bad record to my self on Wikipedia which am now regretting. Theirs no need to be proud and going back to my wrong ways if unblock, Wikipedia never accept such in the first place. Mostly i want all the Wikipedia Admins and editors who have been on my case, Please kindly open your heart to forgive me all the past have done. The reason why am coming back is not because of an interest in editing or creating an article, I came to plead for my wrongs and promised to never to go back to my wrong ways also requesting for a new username will be good, i no longer like the name i used which sound as a team Coal Press Nation (talk) 06:57, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reply to Boing! said Zebedee or Dlohcierekim in over a week. SQLQuery me! 03:43, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Please tell us *all* of the sock accounts you have used. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:10, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, the original block was for a spam user name/spam block. Is that still germane and does it still need to be addressed?--Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:30, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Coal_Press_Nation"