User talk:Closedmouth/Archive 24

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

Important Notice: Your 2013 Arbitration Committee Election vote

Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at the election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis

Good job, dummies. --Closedmouth (talk) 01:08, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your opinion/vote appreciated

Hi Mr Closedmouth,

Feel free to voice your opinion regarding this proposal here. --Philippe Jackson (talk) 05:50, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Euro coins

Per Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 61#Euro coins, your decision that we've discussed here was correct, so I've nominated the rest of the non-free files for review; see Category:Disputed non-free Wikipedia files as of 11 September 2013 (the month is not the current, but I think this should not be a problem). --Eleassar my talk 08:55, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

  • Featured content: F*&!

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

File:Herbert Zwiebel or Herb Bell founder of PackardBell 1933-1971.jpg

Hi! You may want to restore the original version of this file as it doesn't seem to be a fair use image any more. Thanks! 193.40.10.181 (talk) 11:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, haven't been around much lately. Looks like it's been taken care of. --Closedmouth (talk) 12:44, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Fucking Machines thanks

Thank you for your help at Fucking Machines, most appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 06:03, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

No worries. --Closedmouth (talk) 12:45, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2013

Hiding edit summaries

Hi Closedmouth, when you recently changed the visibility of a revision on page User talk:Bilby: edit summary hidden ‎(RD2: Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material), you missed hiding the edit summary of Bilby's subsequent reversion of the troll's edit - so some of the insulting material is still visible in the edit history. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 10:26, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Oops, my mistake, I've just checked it again - you hid the edit summary of Bilby's reversion, but not the troll's edit summary. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 10:30, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

I didn't think the edit summary was so bad, just reads like regular vandalism. --Closedmouth (talk) 12:05, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
No worries, it just seemed a little inconsistent. Chers, Bahudhara (talk) 04:12, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 December 2013

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

User:Luigi911

Hello Closedmouth! I've recently had an interaction with Luigi911 (talk · contribs · page moves · current autoblocks · block log) who you blocked back on 10:19, June 5, 2011 with an expiry time of indefinite for abuse. He or she would like to try and become unblocked and be a productive editor (was the impression I got from the message I received), and I noticed that you didn't leave a {{Blocked}} template on their talk page with what they need to do to become unblocked. I'd just figured I would pop in and inform you that I'm going to put the template on their talk page and instruct them to follow the directions for becoming unblocked in case you wanted to monitor the situation or whatnot. Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 22:53, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014

The Signpost: 12 March 2014

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

The Signpost: 26 March 2014

The Signpost: 02 April 2014

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

The Signpost: 23 April 2014

Protected template needs update

Hello, Closedmouth. You have new messages at Template talk:GEOnet2#Fix needed.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I noticed that in 2011 you protected this template, which seems like a good idea to me, but it needs updating. --Bejnar (talk) 04:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Done. The /doc probably needs to be updated. --Closedmouth (talk) 07:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Laratadelaciudad

Andrewbf's another account Special:Contributions/Laratadelaciudad is doing genre warring and attacking. 183.171.177.214 (talk) 08:12, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Not really familiar with this guy, try asking Kuru about it. --Closedmouth (talk) 08:17, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2014

Changed procedure for F5 deletions

With File:Treasure Cove Concept Art.jpg and some other files, you have used an alternative method for handling F5 deletions where the file history, but not the files, remain on the page. Would you mind changing back to the previous method where all information was removed? When you carry out F5 deletions in the way done with File:Treasure Cove Concept Art.jpg, you confuse the database report of non-free files with orphaned revisions: files with revisions deleted this way are still listed there, making it harder to find files which need to be tagged with {{subst:orfurrev}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:30, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Which report is this? It's probably simple enough to update the code to exclude files with revdel'd old versions. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 May 2014

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

Older audio versions

Hi Closedmouth. Thanks for removing the older versions of File:Megadeth - Rattlehead.ogg and File:Symphony of Destruction clip.ogg, but it seems that you've forgot to delete the older version from the file history of the audios. Can you fix this up?--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 May 2014

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

A heading

Do not undo those edits or you will be sorry. I don't go around and fucking up your business do I ?

Don't be absurd. --Closedmouth (talk) 12:13, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

File deletion

Hi, you rev-deleted a higher-resolution version of File:SSU-logo.png. Can I ask why? I've been asked to restore it, and it does seem to have been released under a CC BY license. -Pete (talk) 19:04, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

If you look at the history, the licence was changed after I deleted the file. Do what you want with it. --Closedmouth (talk) 05:40, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Aah, now I see. Thank you. -Pete (talk) 17:59, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

User talk:ChoateRosemaryHall

Any concerns with unblocking ChoateRosemaryHall? New name is within guidelines, although I would prefer one that does not appear to be a role account. His edits were COI, but not overtly promotional. Rope? Kuru (talk) 13:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Yeah no objections here. You can do it if you want, I won't be editing for at least the next 12 hours. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:15, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Done; I've put their talk page and the target article on my watchlist as well. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 15:27, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Nicholaos Mixaloliakos

The wikipedia page on the latest national elections in Greece Greek_legislative_election,_2015 lacks a photo of the leader of the third party. I tried to upload his official photo to wikipedia but the system tells me that you have previously deleted the same file [1] citing non-free criterion. Which does not apply in this case since the official photo is meant to be freely used for publishing purposes. Please advice. Dianelos (talk) 14:50, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

"annoyinng" ?

* 20:57, 21 December 2015 Closedmouth (talk | contribs) changed visibility of a revision on page Wikipedia:Requested moves: edit summary hidden (annoyinng) [2]

Curious as to what sort of annoyance (and annoyance to whom) justifies/ed removal from the public record?

I've seen many edit summaries I consider annoying for various reasons. Should I start bringing them to your attention? Spelling 'annoying' "annoyinng"(sic) might be irksome to some for instance ... ;-) ... but personally I find typos pretty trivial and readily forgivable.

Jesting aside, I really am curious what happened. 'Twas an anomalous/puzzling entry to come across. A bit of elaboration would be appreciated.

--Kevjonesin (talk) 05:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

It was character spam that screwed up the layout of the page's history. I could have selected RD3 from the dropdown box but I figured "annoying" is more accurate and that nobody would really even care. And yes, my keyboard's "N" key is playing up and I didn't catch the typo before pressing submit. --Closedmouth (talk) 07:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for clarifying. Makes sense now. In hindsight—20/20, and all that—perhaps an edit summary of "edit summary hidden (character spam)" would have communicated better as 'annoying' without elaboration can come off a bit capricious. Thank you for responding, --Kevjonesin (talk) 07:35, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Xmasvater

That has to be one of the funnier declines I've seen. Thanks for the comic (yet still apt) relief.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:59, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

:-) --Closedmouth (talk) 08:30, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Template talk:Short pages monitor

You may be interested in the discussion at Template talk:Short pages monitor#Need to define and possibly rethink this template. —Anomalocaris (talk) 23:27, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Hoho24

I'm sorry to make unconstructive edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrub140 (talk • contribs) 09:11, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Protest.jpg

This is claimed to be an album cover but doesn't look like one. It seems that the picture was overwritten in 2008. Could you check if it should be reverted to the original deleted file revision? I suspect that someone overwrote the album cover with an unrelated photograph. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

It was indeed, though I'm getting an error when trying to undelete the album cover. It's probably easier just to upload the version from Amazon, especially considering the version we had was almost incomprehensibly small and low-quality. --Closedmouth (talk) 04:42, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Never mind, the bug that was causing the error has been squashed and I've reverted back to the album cover. --Closedmouth (talk) 14:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
I also disambiguated the file name, to help prevent it happening again. --Closedmouth (talk) 05:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing this! --Stefan2 (talk) 13:39, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Hard Worker's Barnstar
Looks like you've been around here a while! Just about all your edits appear to be constructive. Peter Sam Fan 15:36, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Resilient Barnstar
For those edits that weren't constructive! Keegan (talk) 22:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you!

I left user:your new account has been created a create-page warning for an unpleasant page about bad things happening to wiki admins, and he proceeded to post a page about similar things happening to me. Thanks for blocking him! Joel.Miles925 (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)


New York Mets

Would you please also PP New York Mets (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)? Also being vandalized. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 02:41, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Closedmouth. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism.
Message added 06:34, 5 June 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:34, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Loxley?

You have just told me that you undid my contribution to this page. I made no contribution at all so your message must have been intended for someone else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.150.98.91 (talk) 07:17, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Musical.ly

I believe that was outside A7's scope (apps are software, not web content), and there was evidence of notability, as given on the talk page. Adam9007 (talk) 13:15, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

http://musical.ly/
You're arguing semantics, the article isn't just about the piece of software, it's about the network of information that the software accesses to provide its service, not to mention the company that operates and profits from said service. There was nothing in the article indicating its importance or significance. It was a simple sentence describing what it is. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
It's still not web content, as the world wide web is not the same thing as the internet. As the article said "musical.ly is an app that..." blah blah blah, it sounds like software to me. It also has coverage in reliable secondary sources, as given on the talk page. Adam9007 (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Vandalism @Urban studies and planning

Thank you Dan arndt (talk) 04:56, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Longest books listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Longest books. Since you had some involvement with the Longest books redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Wrelwser43 (talk) 14:54, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Closedmouth. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Boner law listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Boner law. Since you had some involvement with the Boner law redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nevé–selbert 22:01, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Closedmouth.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Closedmouth. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Closedmouth!

Happy New Year!

Closedmouth,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Donner60 (talk) 06:00, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Closedmouth/Archive_24"