User talk:CharliesAngel99210

CharliesAngel99210, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi CharliesAngel99210! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:07, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Harem (zoology)

Hi, and welcome. What are "inherent offspring"? This ancient biologist can't recall hearing the term... maybe you could explain, link the term, or use another phrase. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Cover (insurance company) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cover (insurance company), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 18:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Every sentence should have a citation now. Thank you.CharliesAngel99210 (talk) 11:16, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020

Hello CharliesAngel99210. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:CharliesAngel99210. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=CharliesAngel99210|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 18:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello Praxidicae, thank you for coming to my Talk Page. This is not the case. I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for any of my edits. I am editing and creating articles on my own accord. Thank you. CharliesAngel99210 (talk) 19:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Personally I find that hard to believe. Your editing looks exactly like paid editing. Please don't use vetpracticemag.com.au, it is a trash reference and hardly could be considered a reliable source. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:04, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Marlena Lopez moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Marlena Lopez, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 18:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cover (insurance company) (February 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cover (insurance company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cover (insurance company), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 11:16, 14 February 2020 (UTC)