User talk:Captain Chicky

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Captain Chicky, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Learn from others
• Be kind to others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us a bit about yourself
• Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 02:57, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Tip of the day...

How to use red links

When a link in Wikipedia leads to nowhere, it is displayed in red to alert our editors that it requires attention. A red link can mean one of two things:

1. The link is broken and no longer leads to an article (perhaps because the underlying article was deleted). In such a case, the link needs to be removed or renamed to point to an existing article.
2. A new article is needed. When a Wikipedian writes an article, it is common practice to linkify key topics pertinent to an understanding of the subject, even if those topics don't have an article on Wikipedia yet. This has two applications:
   1. From within an article, such a link prepares the article to be fully supported. At any time, a Wikipedian may independently write an article on the linked-to subject, and when this happens, there's already a link ready and waiting for it. The red link also gives readers the opportunity to click on it to create the needed article on the spot.
   2. In topic lists, it is useful to include every topic on the subject you can possibly find or think of. When they are turned into links, the list immediately shows where the gaps in Wikipedia's coverage for that subject are, since all of the topics missing articles will show up in red. Such lists are useful tools in developing subject areas on Wikipedia, as they show where work is needed most.

Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip

Read more:

Help:Starting a new page

Wikipedia:WikiProject Red Link Recovery

Become a Wikipedia tipster

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Organelle

I saw your message on organelle, and while I'm not an admin, the proper place to request this is at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. It does indeed look like it needs protection, I must say. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 04:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

January 2023

This is your only warning; if you add an inappropriate image to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bedivere (talk) 13:11, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

You are not a Wikipedia administrator. Furthermore, I have also opened a topic on the talk page to discuss this particular entry, so discuss it there, instead of on my talk page. Do not make empty threats to regular users of Wikipedia. Captain Chicky (talk) 18:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

I am not an administrator but I can always report you. Please remember to be civil. Your edits were reverted by several users. If you continue to engage in edit wars you will be blocked by an administrator. Bedivere (talk) 19:44, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Also, toast has been removed from the list so the point of the thread on the talk page is moot. Bedivere (talk) 20:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Fair enough. Let’s end it here then. Captain Chicky (talk) 05:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Likewise, I advise you to be civil and not make empty threats. If you may observe, the edit you are referring to is literally the first edit I have made on the page, with provided reason and an extension to discussion. Please be more observant instead of directly accusing and threatening another user. Captain Chicky (talk) 05:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Dottie number

Arctangent of tangent is a trick, to evaluate this integral, you have to evaluate its piece-wise, to do it, you have to put Dottie number into the integration limits. In other words, it is like $\int _{0}^{D}1dx$, an itegral, which is equal to the Dottie number but trivial. In other words, to evaluate it you should already know Dottie number.

Let look into it more precise. Arctangent of tangent is a sawtooth function with discontinuinty at $\pi /2$: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=Arctan%5BTan%5Bx%5D%5D. So, the integral ${\frac {1}{\pi }}\int _{0}^{\pi }\arctan \left(\tan \left({\frac {t-\sin t+{\frac {\pi }{2}}}{2}}\right)\right){\text{ d}}t$ should be represented as ${\frac {1}{\pi }}\int _{0}^{N}{\frac {t-\sin t+{\frac {\pi }{2}}}{2}}{\text{ d}}t+{\frac {1}{\pi }}\int _{N}^{\pi }{\frac {t-\sin t+{\frac {\pi }{2}}}{2}}-\pi {\text{ d}}t$ where the number N is the solution of ${\frac {N-\sin N+{\frac {\pi }{2}}}{2}}=\pi /2$ which itself needs Dottie number to be expressed. Reciprocist (talk) 20:32, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Icic

I checked the floor function integral now that you’ve mentioned this and it’s pretty much the same thing lol so makes sense

thanks Captain Chicky (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)