User talk:Can Not

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I became tired of these non-notable ancient comments.

Placing stuff like this on the article is not appropriate, even if it is Fred Phelps. —Random832 06:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I just thought someone on the Fred Phelps page might have actually been wanting to read about vaginal cleaning. --Can Not (talk) 05:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edits to Project Chanology

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Project Chanology , did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. BJTalk 00:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Anonymous (group). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 07:17, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your removal of cited material [1], [2], The Northern Light appears to be a valid source, which is cited appropriately. You may wish to read WP:RS and WP:V, and also discuss your removal of cited material on the article's talk page, please. Cirt (talk) 22:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please respond to the valid comments by Ayla (talk · contribs) and by Ned Scott (talk · contribs), at Talk:Anonymous_(group)#List_of_False_and_Misleading_Information. Cirt (talk) 23:01, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User Page Redirection

Redirecting your user page to an article is disruptive. Your user page is linked in article histories, etc. It is confusing to people to click on a user name and end up at an article. As you continue to redirect your page, I have protected it. If you ever decide that you want to change the contents, let me know and I'll unprotect it as long as you don't redirect it again. -- JLaTondre (talk) 22:03, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]