User talk:Cadavidf

Your article Esternocleico chimiracido

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Esternocleico chimiracido to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Allahomora^(talk) 18:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Esternocleico chimiracido

Hello Cadavidf,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Esternocleico chimiracido for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —swpb^T 18:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Percigalo multifuncional limbidinoso

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Percigalo multifuncional limbidinoso to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 19:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-English contributions

Por favor, no contribuya con textos en español a la Wikipedia en inglés. En cambio, sus contribuciones en español serán muy bienvenidas en la Wikipedia en español. Please do not contribute text in Spanish to English Wikipedia. Your contributions are more than welcome at the Spanish Wikipedia. --Drm310 (talk) 19:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Cadavidf. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 19:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A good joke, but...

Wikipedia is not a place for you to tell the world about your new miracle substances, even if they were developed to the point where you could afford printed labels. The reasons are explained at Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. For more detail, see:

Wikipedia:No original research which includes:

"If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery."

Wikipedia:Verifiability, summarised as "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source"

Spanish versions: es:Wikipedia:Verificabilidad, es:Wikipedia:Wikipedia no es una fuente primaria JohnCD (talk) 19:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]