Just out of curiousity on your recent edit, are stage pin connectors not used in England? 48v 00:39, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No, we use either a 15a rated round-pin plug BS 546 in a similar configuration to our 13a domestic plugs BS 1363 (although our domestic plugs are square pinned) in older (and some new) installations and 16a plugs IEC 60309 in newer installations. Having worked in the US and the UK, I find Stage Pin and Twistlok connectors to be somewhat flimsy, but that's POV, of course.
Interesting. Thanks for explaining! 48v 17:04, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! This might be far fetched, but do you (or anyone else reading this) have any ideas of how i get the martin show designer to work along with the hog 3pc when they both are installed on the same computer? If you do, would u mind send me some instructions on anders.hovnew@hotbrev.com? You would be of great help! -anders
Worth a try, I guess. Not specifically, I don't know, but: If you try some of the forums listed on the Stagecraft page, that might be a better place to ask those sorts of questions. Bryson430 00:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
IA Spam
Re your latest edit to Stagecraft, it seems to me that IA is a valid link in see also. Just because someone is spamming doesn't mean that everything they post is spam. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by StarX (talk • contribs) 23:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Thanks StarX. The reason i removed it is that an IP keeps spamming every stagecraft related page with that same "professional stagehands (IATSE)" stuff. If it had said: see also IATSE: Union for stagehands I could see a possible link, but you have to understand that this isn't the first time I've had to remove out-of-context spam from that user. If you want to reinsert it with a useful description (which it didn't have) feel free. The other thing is the person who does it keeps putting thier stuff as the very first item in the list, regardless of relative importance. A small thing, but irritating. Bryson430 23:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your POV completely; I've re-inserted the link at the bottom of the see also list, using their name and not their abbreviation (it looks more encyclopedic that way anyhow) and a description. From the sounds of things, someone is a little too proud of their union card. --starX 16:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nice one. It makes sense in the context that you've inserted it. Thanks for that. Bryson430 16:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the prod because that was a phenomenon I was familiar with in theater. I am not an expert in theater lighting, but that article seemed to me to be neither a non-notable term nor an uncontroversial deletion. You're welcome to AfD it if you disagree. Chubbles 16:38, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and welcome to this, the first ever edition of the WikiProject Stagecraft Newsletter! If you haven't been over to the WikiProject page lately then you're missing out - the whole thing has undergone a complete makeover - see below for more info!
On top of this, we have brand spanking new templates (such as this one) and a completely revamped Collaboration of the Month - again, see below for more info on all of this.
Finally, a warning - the new-look WikiProject is still having the finishing touches put on it. If you find something that doesn't work, you don't agree with or is just plain missing, please don't hesitate to let us know on the WikiProject's talk page. We'll try our very best to fix ASAP!
New Look
As mentioned above, the WikiProject has recently undergone a spring-clean and we're excited about it! If you don't mind - we'd like to take this opportunity to explain some of the features and generally show off about it a little.
Colour scheme All pages on the WikiProject now use two consistent shades of blue as part of the new streamlined interface (Those techies amongst us may wish to know that the precise names of the colours we use are: "lightblue" for headings and "#c0e0e0" for backgrounds).
Navigation Menu Every page on the WikiProject now has the official WikiProject navigation menu so you can easily flick between pages and get back to the main project page. Say goodbye to clicking the back button several times!
To Do list/Open Tasks If you're stuck on what to do to help us then a list of the most important tasks is now available on the main page. At the moment, the list is looking a little short so if you have found something that you think ought to be added, then feel free to edit the list and let us know. Please refrain from linking to a specific article that generally needs an overall update. Single articles like this should be nominated for a future Collaboration of The Month - see below.
Templates
All of the project's templates are now arranged in one handy page. Whilst we were going through we also noticed one was missing. We have now added the new template in the form of:
{{WPStagecraftWelcome}} - a welcome tag to be placed on the talk page of a new user.
{{WPStagecraft Newsletter}} - the template containing the latest edition of the WikiProject Newsletter (you're looking at it now!)
Collaboration of the Month
Ok, so this isn't exactly a new feature. It's always been there but has never really been updated on a, ahem, monthly basis. The Collaboration of the Month (COTM) is now in template form to enable it to be streamlined across the Project, without having to be manually updated on each page. Don't worry if we've lost you at this point - the point is, it works! You can now nominate an article for COTM on the COTM page.
The more sharp-eyed amongst you may well have noticed that the COTM at the moment is still that old fella, Stage lighting. That's because no-one has nominated a COTM for this month (being a new feature an' all...) so we've decided to leave it as it is for this month until a new one has been democratically voted for.
And finally...
Thanks very much for reading down this far - hopefully future newsletters won't be this long! Please, if you can, invite new members and drop us a line over at the talk page to let us know what you think of the new look/newsletter and any suggestions you may have.
You have received this newsletter because your name is on the list of Participants on the WikiProject page. If (like most of the old WikiProject) this information is out of date and you no longer wish to receive the newsletter, please remove your name from the Participants list and also click here to stop receiving the newsletter.
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please let us know here. To view previous editions of the newsletter, click here. If you have any news or any announcements to be broadcast, do let us know on the talk page.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
