User talk:Borates Today

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Roohit18 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Roohit18. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 20:52, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Borates Today (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

You admit to an intent to edit promotionally and with an unacceptable username. You also don't say anything about the sockpuppetry allegations. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

We would like to have the block removed for the following reasons. We are a legitimate brand making daily contributions to our website https://borates.today We have multiple positive reviews from readers and a growing presence on the web with over 200 original articles written and available for review from general articles on boron and borates to scientific summaries intended for the general and business readership to learn more about this topic. We have content which is not available or covered by wikipedia. As Editor in Chief, I am a professional with 40 years experience in business and content, former CEO. I have a team to help me produce content and sometimes we log in to update where I do not have cycles to improve the coverage of Borates Today. I don't know what sockpuppet means. I certainly am not trying to exploit this for nefarious purposes. If he Rohit18 avccoubn is the offendiun one, then we can proceed with my account in future and not that one. Pleases confirm what is needed to unblock this account. Sincerely.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Borates Today (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

We did not admit to edit promotionally. Where did I say that? Please clarify. The only reason we link to other Wikipedia articles is to answer a request from editors to provide more citation. What is an unacceptable username? Borate Today is the name of the online publication we use to write about boron and borates. Please clarify how that is an unacceptable username. on sockpuppetry, as ai said, I don't know what that means so I can't address an allegation I don't understand. 58.176.254.234 (talk) 05:35, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please place your initial statement within the block notice as I did here for you; subsequent statements may be outside it. Only a single person should be operating this account. You will need to propose a new username that reflects that fact(your real name is not required). For a description of what sockpuppetry is please click on and read WP:SOCK. Wikipedia is not a directory of companies where every company gets a page just for existing and can decide what appears on it. Wikipedia articles summarize what independent reliable sources state about the topic, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability. We have no interest in helping your company build its brand or help customers find it. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.