User talk:Boldy1

Your edits to Beverly Hills High School

I see you have been experimenting with Wikipedia. Your change was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Accurizer 19:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Accurizer 19:07, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not nonsense. It's absolutely true--a well known fact. Isn't this encyclopedia supposed to be unbiased?

Wikipedia is not a place to post jokes about your school's teachers and administrators. Please read the links on Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers as well as Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not to answer your questions about Wikipedia. Accurizer 19:16, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is in reply to the comments you posted on my talk page. You're correct in that Wikipedia is not censored, but that is not the issue here. Please read further, see Wikipedia:Verifiability. Accurizer 19:54, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Three-revert rule

Hi, I wanted to make sure you are aware of the three-revert rule at Wikipedia. Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. (This rule does not apply for self-reverts, removing vandalism, or removing edits by a blocked user.) Accurizer 20:09, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The joke

Hay... the joke is funny. It made me chuckle. But unfortunately it can't stay:( One rule here is that everything must be independently verifiable by a reliable source. (see WP:V and WP:RS for more info). If the joke is mentioned in a newspaper or book then it would then be ok to include. (School paper dosn't count) Thanks for your contributions and have a nice day! ---J.S (t|c) 20:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Fale Accusation

Actually, I reverted to your correct version. Check the diff. --Zsinj^Talk 02:47, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, no worries. :-) --Zsinj^Talk 02:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page policy

Hi Boldy1, Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. Regards, Accurizer 21:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]