User talk:Bluenosescholar

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

November 2017

It appears that you're editing many articles primarily to add references from one author (even when you haven't added any new information). Please stop, particularly if you have a connection with that author. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 20:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. You can see from my history that I am a newcomer to Wikipedia. (I have had an account for a while, but have not been brave enough to do much editing before this.) I see there is a page offering guidance about not [biting the newcomers]. I will take your comment under advisement. Please appreciate that I am learning as I go.

September 2020

I see you've been cautioned about this before. At Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, it does not take four external references to support one short sentence. Please stop. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677 - The references added to Scholarship of Teaching and Learning show how the field is developing. The four external references are to different sources, written by different authors from different institutions. The references show how the thinking behind the 4M framework has developed, who developed it, and how it has evolved, so the four references to support this emerging development in the field are, in fact, necessary. I do not receive any compensation (financial or otherwise) to contribute to wikipedia.Bluenosescholar (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you:@John B123: for moving this page to a draft format. This is the first time I am attempting to create a new page. I appreciate the opportunity to keep working on it in draft format. I also appreciate your professional and helpful approach. I have updated the draft and submitted it for review.Bluenosescholar (talk) 01:12, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bluenosescholar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]