User talk:BingBong2001
Welcome!
|
Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, BingBong2001. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Natascha Engel, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. In your edit summary made when adding information about Natascha Engel's role as fracking commissioner, you wrote that you "Added my current role." If you used the first person intentionally, and you are Natascha Engel, you should be aware of the conflict of interest guidelines, which applies to any edit you make on the Natascha Engel page, as well as the Lee Rowley page, which you've also edited, as he defeated Natascha Engel at the last election. schetm (talk) 19:04, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
I don’t have a conflict of interest, am aware of the guidance thanks and am following it. Just bored of Impsfan inserting bias on Wikipedia - editing certain politicians only in a negative way and ignoring edits from users who complain against Impsfan’s failure to adhere to neutral point of view rules, excessive detail issues which should be on separate pages, and his ongoing agenda. BingBong2001 (talk) 19:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, BingBong2001. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Lee Rowley, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 22:15, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- Could you please stop removing cited content from Lee Rowley, especially with an unaddressed COI possibility. Edwardx (talk) 13:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
There is no COI. I have no association. I object to users refusing to acknowledge their biased point of view and adherence to neutral point of view policies and accepted editorial positions about overly long and irrelevant content or content that belongs elsewhere BingBong2001 (talk) 21:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021
Your recent editing history at Lee Rowley shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)