Hello, Bill G. Evans! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! LittleOldMe (talk) 13:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Elefante, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Elefante was changed by Bill G. Evans(u)(t) score equals -1098 on 2008-05-09T23:36:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Replaceable fair use File:Angelfire-header-wiki.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Angelfire-header-wiki.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Angus McLellan(Talk)20:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File copyright problem with File:Sarah_spencer-a.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Sarah_spencer-a.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:Sarah spencer-a.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sarah spencer-a.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nimbus School of Recording Arts, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages AVID and Kevin Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi Bill, I have completed my copyediting and bare URL-repair process, so please feel free to have a look at the page since I have reviewed it, as well as the tags that remain, and let me know what else we can collaborate on. Thanks for the initial contact, by the way!--Soulparadox (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bob Ezrin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Darkness (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hey Bill, yes I have been incredibly busy, so apologize for the lapse—we still need the reference tag up there, as there are some important sections that need citations. I will insert the tags now, as I may not have time to get to it today; but will try to work on this page this week. Also, I may be incorrect about the citations for this section—I will make an inquiry now.--Soulparadox (talk) 02:13, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:Radiant records-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hi, thanks for all the compliments and contributions. Be aware, however, that your recent edits at Second Nature changed sourced content in a way it contradicts the references. For example, you wrote that the cover artwork for the first album was designed by you, whereas Morse said in the interview that it was found and licensed on the internet, and your name is not even mentioned. Unless you provide a verifiable source that contradicts what Morse said in that interview, we should favor the sourced version of the text. Also, the second edit added details not found in the given source: like the band considering the experience with Peter Collins as "overwhelmingly positive" or the band deciding to work alone "to experiment with working on their own". I hope you don't mind me changing it back to how it was. Victão LopesFala!23:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I guess I understand where you're coming from. But more than that, I appreciate you taking the time to explain your thinking. The world would be a much better place if more people did that. This whole thing is a bit surreal…reading about myself and the guys…what we supposedly did, and why we supposedly did it. It's a bit strange to me that an interview on the internet carries more weight than the actual person coming here and saying, "Actually, it's like this." I mean…I suppose I could ask the website to issue a correction…it just seems a bit narcissistic. I guess more important to me is what people think we've said about other people. We loved working with Peter…he's a genius and gentleman. And funny. But readers may not get that impression from the Wikipedia article…and we wouldn't people to think that, because we don't. I hear what you're saying, though, and will respect your change. But how do we fix this stuff? Bill G. Evans (talk) 02:55, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that any content added here must be attributed to a source: a book, an interview, an official statement. Of course what you say is important and must be taken into account, but there are methods for doing so. For example, if you simply make a comment on Flying Colors' official Facebook page stating that Morse's answer was inaccurate and that the cover was created by you, it would be enough as a source for clarification. But commenting on Wikipedia itself - it makes us aware of the problem, but it does not necessarily work as solution in itself. And be aware that, while I fully believe you are Bill Evans, others might not. I mean, we do not have verified accounts as they do in Facebook or Twitter.
OK, cool. I get what you're saying. Thank you for explaining. I will do as you suggest.
Disambiguation link notification for November 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Second Nature (Flying Colors album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Collins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Ok man, but be careful with your words anyway, because even if I didn't take any offense, any other user that notices that edit may issue you a warning for personal attacks, due to our policies on civility. Cheers, Victão LopesFala!03:38, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Bill G. Evans. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Bill G. Evans. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.