User talk:Bancquo

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Problems with upload of File:Harviestoun Castle from Western Driveway c.1968.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Harviestoun Castle from Western Driveway c.1968.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:09, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Harviestoun Castle from East.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Harviestoun Castle from East.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:09, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cockburn Works, (Vogue Bathrooms) Falkirk concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cockburn Works, (Vogue Bathrooms) Falkirk, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cockburn Works, (Vogue Bathrooms) Falkirk

Hello, Bancquo. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Cockburn Works".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cahk (talk) 08:53, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cockburn Works, (Vogue Bathrooms) Falkirk has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cockburn Works, (Vogue Bathrooms) Falkirk. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 11:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A thought or two.
First, find all the references you can about this foundry. We need references thus:
We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.
Then marshall them into a logical order and write what they say about thus foundry and use them as rifle targeted references to cite those facts.
Write it from scratch, ignoring your current words. Do this as a technical exercise in drafting an article. I know why yo will not wish to, bit you will get a better draft from it.
Take any of the truly interesting facts about iron founding, find citations for them and consider adding them to a more generic article that probably already exists. Only include relevant ones in this draft.
It feels like harder work, but is actually not. It turns it from a difficult exercise into a process driven one, and lets you write short, pithy, yet flowing sentences. Fiddle Faddle 11:43, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at Foundry this seems comprehensive, though I think you may well have something to ad to it in due course. Fiddle Faddle 12:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cockburn Works, (Vogue Bathrooms) Falkirk (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The article must be built from information found in third-party sources (newspapers, magazines) that are independent of the subject of the article. Those sources must be referenced in-line with the text they support. No un-referenced material is allowed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Bancquo, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cockburn Works, (Vogue Bathrooms) Falkirk

Hello, Bancquo. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Cockburn Works".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 23:11, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Bancquo"