User talk:Babesonion

Thanks!

I knew that, but forgot to add it in ( that edit on the list of pokemon episodes). Thanks!Leomk0403 (Don't shout here, Shout here!) 01:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Bianca Lawson

added a link pointing to Rockwell

Denise Gordy

added a link pointing to Rockwell

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mathew Knowles, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. We don't use degrees or titles. Meters (talk) 22:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And on Tina Knowles Meters (talk) 22:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And please read WP:MINOR.Meters (talk) 22:55, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless "genderfying" of animal articles

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:34, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning for pointless gendering

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:32, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hiding vandalism

Next time, please check articles for major vandalism before “fixing typos”. Not doing this may hide the vandalism from other editors who try to fix it.

EditPatroller296 (talk) 23:04, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Webull, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ––FormalDude talk 07:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Webull, you may be blocked from editing. ––FormalDude talk 04:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Babesonion! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. ––FormalDude talk 23:25, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not censored

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nude swimming, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:36, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 03:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edit summaries

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Charles Schwab Corporation. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Edit summaries like this and misusing minor edit option (see Special:Contributions/Babesonion) are discouraged. Sneha04 ^💬 03:47, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Toronto-Dominion Bank

If you boldly move a page and another editor objects and reverts it back to the original title, your next step is to start a move discussion by following the steps at WP:RSPM, not to engage in a page-move war. DanCherek (talk) 02:22, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Toronto-Dominion Bank. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

I can see from your Talk page you appear unwilling to abide by the community's guidelines, which is entirely unacceptable. Per WP:BRD, you need to move the article back to Toronto-Dominion Bank and seek consensus for your change. Per WP:STATUSQUO, it has been stable there for years and should remain there unless there's a consensus that it should move. And for the third or fourth time, something's official name is not how articles are necessarily named at Wikipedia, as per WP:COMMONNAME. Toronto-Dominion Bank is by far the more common name. Joeyconnick (talk) 16:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same issue with moving TD Canada Trust: you moved, you were reverted... if you want the page moved at this point, initiate a WP:RM. —Joeyconnick (talk) 16:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOSHEAD

Please follow the manual of style regarding section headings; that is, use sentence case versus capitalizing every word. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:27, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unsourced material to Breastaurant

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. [1]. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:33, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

National varieties of English

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Chimpanzee, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 03:19, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Schwab

The reference literally says in plain English "THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION"(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)". You cannot get any clearer than that so stop removing a sourced edit.--Tærkast (Discuss) 15:19, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original research, BLP-violations, etc

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:54, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2nd block for adding unsourced material; next block will be longer

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:25, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, I'm SNUGGUMS. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:26, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ivana Trump, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You're adding unsourced commentary. Please stop ZimZalaBim ^talk 02:33, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Emilio Estefan, you may be blocked from editing. ZimZalaBim ^talk 02:37, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:42, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #61696

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:52, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is closed? Babesonion (talk) 00:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was my appeal rejected? Babesonion (talk) 00:20, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was rejected. You should be able to click on the link in the heading and view it. Given your previous warnings and blocks, you seem to be unwilling or unable to follow Wikipedia policy, especially our verifiability policy. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:49, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not that I’m “unwilling”, it’s that I try to cite my sources and the coding engine won’t let me! How do I appeal again? Babesonion (talk) 04:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then it appears that you are unable. The block message above includes a link to our guide to appealing blocks. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:44, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you, I will re-appeal now. Babesonion (talk) 00:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]