User talk:AverageEarthman

Ways to improve Rattan Lal

Hello, AverageEarthman,

Thank you for creating Rattan Lal.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The only source here is from his employer, not an independent source

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:26, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yoshio Okamoto has been accepted

Yoshio Okamoto, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Zanhe (talk) 04:29, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Debra Roberts

The article Debra Roberts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, either as an academic or her work as co-chair

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I disagreed with this proposal, as I felt that as the IPCC is a very notable (Nobel Prize winning) body, and there are only six co-chairs (two each in the three working groups), deletion of a co-chair is not obvious or uncontroversial AverageEarthman (talk) 13:52, 19 December 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Nomination of Debra Roberts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Debra Roberts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debra Roberts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note - The result of the discussion was speedy keep. AverageEarthman (talk) 13:52, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, AverageEarthman

Thank you for creating Sara Dosa.

User:Pyrrho the Skipper, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Pyrrho the Skipper}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 17:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Youba Sokona moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Youba Sokona, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Tulsi 24x7 14:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Youba Sokona

Hello, AverageEarthman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Youba Sokona, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]