User talk:Antimonopolist

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 14:10, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Antimonopolist! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 14:10, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Revaz Lordkipanidze (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 04:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To Dear Devoian Wombat

Sincerely respected colleague Devonian Wombat, this is a long-standing study on the experience of the most ancient country and the development of the classics and the family of great scientists and public figures, which are published in multiple encyclopedias. If You don’t like something, please clarify what You don’t like. God Bless You for Your friendly amendments. If You are a friendly person, correct in a friendly way Yourself - we will not be against Your amendments. Antimonopolist (talk) 19:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Revaz Lordk Photo+.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Revaz Lordk Photo+.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:30, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Revaz Lordkipanidze (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
and " using the experience of the Christian fundamentals of natural, physics-mathematical and technical sciences, for practice of inter-money system optimal stimulation and macroeconomic structure marginal efficiency, R. Lordkipanidze defines the force of economic competition" makes little sense!
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:15, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Revaz Lordkipanize Photo+.jpg

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Revaz Lordkipanize Photo+.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 07:07, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Revaz Lordkipanidze has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Revaz Lordkipanidze. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Revaz Lordkipanidze (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Styyx was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Ditto.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 21:06, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear colleague, you probably didn’t notice - a very important link has been added at the end of the references - open this and there are very Important sources for the world economy and consequent peace policy, strengthening the UN and Interpol, with significant scientific discoveries + Antimonopolist (talk) 17:13, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Revaz Lordkipanidze has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Revaz Lordkipanidze. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:40, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Revaz Lordkipanidze has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Revaz Lordkipanidze. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Information icon Hello, Antimonopolist, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Lia Palavandishvili (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 20:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Revaz Lordkipanidze+.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Revaz Lordkipanidze+.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

From Antimonopolist

Dear blessed colleague Super Mario Man, I have had a free page Antimonopolist and it suddenly disappeared. Please check, restore and inform me about it. Antiterrorist, Feb 21, 2022. Antimonopolist (talk) 07:37, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Antimonopolist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a sincere experienced anti-terrorist and now I do not have other accounts http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24703.07841Antimonopolist (talk) 14:48, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Despite your denial, a connection between you and the accounts listed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lia Palavandishvili/Archive seems apparent. Accordingly, I am declining this request. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:17, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear colleague Blablubbs, we are not joking. What connection seems obvious? We are scientists with roots and in the family we had many outstanding ones and now we also have young researchers. If someone used my technique or researched my questions, it does not mean that I now own several accounts. I am a sincere anti-terrorist and if You do not believe this, You can come to visit us. Antimonopolist, Feb 24, 2022. Antimonopolist (talk) 21:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Antimonopolist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We (our family) are scientists with deep roots and had many outstanding ones (now we as well have young researchers) and in the past, apparently, someone used my equipment (computer, mobile, macbook) and researched my topics according to our style and family traditions - I have been a naturally sincere anti-terrorist for many years and sincerely write before God, that I now have only one account (You can come to guests and make sure of our sincerity). Antimonopolist (talk) 09:06, 24 February 2022 (UTC) Feb. 24, 2022[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, it's nice that you're against terrorism, but that has nothing to do with Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's not remotely clear why you keep insisting you are "anti-terrorist"? Theroadislong (talk) 09:12, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear colleagues - Theroadislong and NinjaRobotPirate, I am sure sincerely, that You justify Your names and have come a long and original path of Your professionalism. I have no respect for scientists who do not value Wikipedia and consider this great free encyclopedia as a rabble of the lowest qualification. We answer on Your question and position: By our family tradition in science, we have been publishing writings against terrorism for a long time. And today a vital work was published as well: Actions of the Law of Attraction of Physics in Economics (I organized a multifactorial research using Physics, Mathematics, History, Psychology and Neuroeconomics and came to the vital conclusions, that my Georgia, as other divided countries, will definitely united, like modern Germany). - Theses on Law, Economic Policy and Money: Professionalism and Law-obedience in Everything and for Strong INTERPOL on Foundations of American Lessons to the Best Life: 81: 54: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28325.58085 Antimonopolist (talk) 20:07, 24 February 2022 (UTC) Feb. 25, 2022.[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Antimonopolist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We regard Wikipedia as a sincere and ingenious friend and do not want to leave in vain - Please read new really vital publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28325.58085 Antimonopolist (talk) 20:37, 24 February 2022 (UTC) Feb. 25, 2022[reply]

Decline reason:

Your requests do not address the reason for the block. I'm not sure if this is due to a language barrier or something else, but you seem to lack the skills needed to participate here and you are talking about political issues instead of how you want to contribute to this encyclopedia of human knowledge. I am declining your request and removing talk page access. Further appeals may be made using WP:UTRS. 331dot (talk) 14:49, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://mdwiki.org/wiki/User_talk:Antimonopolist"