User talk:Andy1848

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome!

Hello, Andy1848, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! – XLinkBot (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

December 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bismark Boachie(DJ Premier) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Bismark Boachie(DJ Premier) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hStuXhpMnzQ) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andy1848, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Andy1848! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Bismark Boachie (DJ Premier) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Bismark Boachie (DJ Premier) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr1-7i3v-00, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSZKbAkVYFs, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCkK9H9xueat4EJGoGkjANyg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Andy1848. You have new messages at 78.26's talk page.
Message added 17:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Andy1848. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Barima Kaakyire Agyemang, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Barima Kaakyire Agyemang to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Scorpion293 (talk) 19:47, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Andy1848 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #17408 was submitted on Jan 26, 2017 20:22:54. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 20:22, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Andy1848 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

hello administrators, i was blocked based on using multiple accounts which i don't even know about.my account being link with user call Daniel Kobe ricks which i don't even know, an admin said i wrote on his talk page asking to unblock an article that was created by a ban user.ok, if i was the ban user that created the article will i be so crazy to use a new account with many new articles knowing very well that account will be block and all articles be deleted? i think this an issue of hack account because i use a shared network with other users.. i ask u look into this case for me please Andy1848 (talk) 12:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, but in the light of the clarification below, this account must be considered compromised and can not be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:27, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • To clarify, when you say "i think this an issue of hack account", do you mean you think this account was hacked? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes because i didn't write to unblock any page and it is there that i wrote to unblock a page which resulted in the block of account and deletion of pages.Andy1848 (talk) 12:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • i think is unfair for me to be punish for something that i don't know about, i think u guys are good in investigating and i want u to look into this case deeper. go through all my works and edits history to see if i have done something since i join.im pleading with guys to look at this matter...Andy1848 (talk) 12:22, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    The problem is, if this account has been compromised then you could genuinely be the original owner talking to us now, or you could be the hacker pretending to be the original owner. We have no way of telling. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:35, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, I understand you very well.. Can you please give me idea on what to do next? Or should I open a new account and update you on all edits and articles I make for you to keep track of my works? And what will become of the articles that where deleted and the time I put into creating them? Andy1848 (talk) 22:58, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]