User talk:Amna129

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

January 2023

Hello, I'm Zsohl. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to History of technology because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Zsohl(Talk) 11:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Information icon Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Artificial hair integrations. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1]Bruce1eetalk 08:29, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi Bruce1ee why my link is remove in this pagecitation is needed you can check Amna129 (talk) 08:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Read Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. —Bruce1eetalk 09:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Wig, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. —Bruce1eetalk 09:07, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

hi Bruce1ee sorry for this mistake i never do this mistake again Amna129 (talk) 11:51, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Wig. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. —Bruce1eetalk 13:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Courcelles (talk) 13:19, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amna129 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

please unblock my account i am new in wikipedia thats why i do not know please forgive me for this mistake next i ma very careful about it please unblock my account Amna129 (talk) 16:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please in a new request describe what your mistake was, what you will do differently, and what edits you intend to make. 331dot (talk) 17:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock my account please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amna129 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

reason is that i think i add links to the page thats why you blocked me i said to you before that i am new on wikipedia please give the last warning to me next i will be very careful about it please i request unblock my account i will be very thankful to youAmna129 (talk) 17:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Socking to engage in cross-wiki linkspam is hardly a good faith mistake. --Blablubbs (talk) 11:51, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Amna129 (talk) 17:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What subjects do you want to edit, if unblocked? PhilKnight (talk) 18:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Amna129 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

One request open at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:34, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Amna129 (talk) 18:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]