User talk:Amandagates

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added such as to the page 3 Idiots do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:47, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to 3 Idiots. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:30, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sherlock Holmes (2009 film). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. MWOAP (talk) 03:18, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Sherlock Holmes (2009 film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 17:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

You were blocked for 31 hours for repeatedly adding a copyvio link to Sherlock Holmes (2009 film). I was about to reset the block after seeing overwhelming evidence that you attempted to insert the same link into that article while logged. However, after seeing that ALL of your edits were attempts to add copyvio links, I have determined that your disregard for copyright makes you too great a risk to be allowed to edit. You are blocked indefinitely. Blueboy96 15:09, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Movietips for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Blueboy96 19:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)