User talk:Akp1103

From WikiProjectMed
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In response to your feedback

Hiyas there Akp1103,

In order to move a page your account needs to be autoconfirmed. This is a user rights level that is automatically granted after your account is older than 4 days AND made more then 10 edits. This permission level is needed to move pages, upload images, create new article's and so on.

Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 17:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

In response to your feedback

Hiyas there Akp1103,

If this is your first article, i would (strongly) suggest using the article's for creation process to submit it. The article's for creation process is a review queue where other editors will check the article for you and give feedback based on it that can be used for improvement (Of they will accept it and move it straight to the main article space for you).

I strongly suggest this because article space pages ("Publishes article's") immediately fall under a set of deletion rules that can be complex to meet in one go if its a first-time article. A downside to the AFC process is that it can take longer (Sometimes over a week if the backlog is bad) for an article to be reviewed. Still, for newer users the trade off is often worth it as quite a few new pages end up being removed.

To help with the AFC submission, i took the liberty of placing a sandbox header on your draft page. The last line contains a link that allows you to easily place the page in the review queue. The sandbox header can easily be removed by editing the page and removing the {{user sandbox}} text on top of the page if you so desire.

Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 21:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rev.Fr. Kurakaaran Alexander Valiya Veettil Cor Episcopa.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Rev.Fr. Kurakaaran Alexander Valiya Veettil Cor Episcopa.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:41, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Rev.Fr. Kurakaaran Alexander Valiya Veettil Cor Episcopa, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Rev.Fr. Kurakaaran Alexander Valiya Veettil Cor Episcopa and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Rev.Fr. Kurakaaran Alexander Valiya Veettil Cor Episcopa during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 12:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Kurakaaran Alexander Valiya Veettil has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources to indicate this priest meets the WP:NBIO threshold.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:15, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]